Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorLeahy, Sharon
dc.contributor.authorMcKee, Kim
dc.contributor.authorCrawford, Joe
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-28T00:36:43Z
dc.date.available2019-11-28T00:36:43Z
dc.date.issued2018-06
dc.identifier.citationLeahy , S , McKee , K & Crawford , J 2018 , ' Generating confusion, concern, and precarity through the Right to Rent scheme in Scotland ' , Antipode , vol. 50 , no. 3 , pp. 604-620 . https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12369en
dc.identifier.issn0066-4812
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 250951730
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 7f0d5850-ebbe-41d2-832f-b0d9be920353
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85046095608
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-3611-569X/work/39245042
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000431488300002
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/19013
dc.description.abstractThe Immigration Act 2016 has heralded an era of amplified Government intervention into day-to-day life, placing increased responsibility for border protection on UK citizens. Using interviews with representatives from the field of housing in Scotland, this paper examines one specific aspect of the Immigration Act 2016, the Right to Rent scheme. We investigate how the Right to Rent creates a precarious environment for all those who may appear to be non-UK citizens. We argue that it may endorse senses of fantasy citizenship to inculcate people into acting on behalf of the state and is a driver for further division in society. Scotland provides a particularly interesting case study, as housing is a devolved power, but immigration is not. This creates an additional layer of tension in our interview data, as housing organisations are faced with a set of conditions imposed from Westminster, infringing on a field that Scotland has self-determined for some time. Our interviews illustrate the level of confusion around the scheme, the fact that it is increasing criminalisation in the housing sector, and stresses that the scheme is offloading state responsibility for border protection.
dc.format.extent17
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAntipodeen
dc.rights© 2017 the Author © 2017 Antipode Foundation Ltd. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12369en
dc.subjectImmigration Act 2016en
dc.subjectHousing studiesen
dc.subjectPrecarityen
dc.subjectFantasy citizenshipen
dc.subjectH Social Sciences (General)en
dc.subjectHM Sociologyen
dc.subjectHN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reformen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subjectSDG 10 - Reduced Inequalitiesen
dc.subject.lccH1en
dc.subject.lccHMen
dc.subject.lccHNen
dc.titleGenerating confusion, concern, and precarity through the Right to Rent scheme in Scotlanden
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Geography & Sustainable Developmenten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Minorities Research (CMR)en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12369
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2019-11-28
dc.identifier.urlhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anti.12369/fullen


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record