Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBeall, Jeffrey C
dc.contributor.authorCotnoir, Aaron
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-07T00:36:20Z
dc.date.available2019-11-07T00:36:20Z
dc.date.issued2017-10-01
dc.identifier251493246
dc.identifier377f9560-975d-4a8d-a776-58fda1525c36
dc.identifier000422917400001
dc.identifier85042094687
dc.identifier000422917400001
dc.identifier.citationBeall , J C & Cotnoir , A 2017 , ' God of the Gaps : a neglected reply to God’s stone problem ' , Analysis , vol. 77 , no. 4 , pp. 681–689 . https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anx069en
dc.identifier.issn0003-2638
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-4528-7570/work/65702590
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/18865
dc.description.abstractTraditional monotheism has long faced logical puzzles (omniscience, omnipotence, and more). We argue that such puzzles rest on the assumed logical truth of the Law of Excluded Middle, which we suggest there is little theological reason to accept. By way of illustration we focus on God's alleged stone problem, and present a simple but plausible ‘gappy’ framework for addressing this puzzle. We assume familiarity with the proposed (subclassical) logic but an appendix is offered as a brief review.
dc.format.extent9
dc.format.extent250987
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAnalysisen
dc.subjectTheismen
dc.subjectOmnipotenceen
dc.subjectOmniscienceen
dc.subjectParadoxgapsen
dc.subjectParacompleteen
dc.subjectSubclassicalen
dc.subjectLogicen
dc.subjectBC Logicen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccBCen
dc.titleGod of the Gaps : a neglected reply to God’s stone problemen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Philosophyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Philosophical, Anthropological and Film Studiesen
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/analys/anx069
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2019-11-07


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record