Show simple item record

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorKristensson, Per Ola
dc.contributor.advisorNederhof, Mark-Jan
dc.contributor.authorReyal, Shyam Mehraaj
dc.coverage.spatial[7], 244 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-05T15:23:52Z
dc.date.available2019-11-05T15:23:52Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-26
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/18851
dc.description.abstractThis work presents four in-depth empirical investigations on the performance and user experience of three popular mainstream mobile text entry methods: Touch Typing on a Software Keyboard (STK), the Gesture Typing on a Software Keyboard (SGK), and Speech Based Text Entry. The first and third studies are lab-based longitudinal text entry experiments. In the second and fourth studies, we use a new text entry evaluation methodology based on the experience sampling method (ESM). In the ESM based studies, participants installed an Android app on their own mobile phones that periodically sampled their text entry performance and user experience amid their everyday activities for four weeks. The studies show that text can be entered at an average speed of 24 to 41 WPM using software keyboards, and 49 to 59 WPM using speech, depending on the method and the user's experience, with 0.9% to 3.6% character error rates remaining for software keyboard and 3.0% to 5.8% for speech. Error rates of SGK and speech based input are a major challenge; and reducing out-of-vocabulary errors is particularly important. Both typing and speech have strengths, weaknesses, and different individual awareness and preferences. Two-thumb touch typing in a focused setting is particularly effective on STK, whereas one-handed SGK typing with the thumb is particularly effective in more mobile situations. Speech is more effective when convenience and constraints take priority, whereas typing is more preferable in public – due to social concerns, network latency issues and background noise. When exposed, users showed a trend to migrate from STK to SGK. We also conclude that studies in the lab and in the wild can both be informative to reveal different aspects of keyboard and speech based text entry, but used in conjunction is more reliable in comprehensively assessing input technologies of current and future generations.en_US
dc.description.sponsorship"This work was supported by the Scottish Informatics and Computer Science Alliance (SICSA), ... the University of St Andrews (School of Computer Science), ...[and] the University of St Andrews (International Student Hardship Fund)." -- Acknowledgementsen
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.titleInvestigation of keyboard and speech based text entry on mobile devicesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorScottish Informatics and Computer Science Alliance (SICSA)en_US
dc.contributor.sponsorUniversity of St Andrews. School of Computer Scienceen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.rights.embargodate2022-02-13
dc.rights.embargoreasonThesis restricted in accordance with University regulations. Electronic copy restricted until 13th February 2022en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/10023-18851


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record