St Andrews Research Repository

St Andrews University Home
View Item 
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • Philosophical, Anthropological & Film Studies (School of)
  • Philosophy
  • Philosophy Theses
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • Philosophical, Anthropological & Film Studies (School of)
  • Philosophy
  • Philosophy Theses
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • Philosophical, Anthropological & Film Studies (School of)
  • Philosophy
  • Philosophy Theses
  • View Item
  • Register / Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Analogy, rule-following and meaning

Thumbnail
View/Open
AndrewWilliamsMPhilThesis.pdf (1.151Mb)
Date
28/06/2018
Author
Williams, Andrew Simeon
Supervisor
Glick, Ephraim
Greenough, Patrick
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
In this thesis, I argue that meaning something by a linguistic expression should be thought to consist, not in following a rule, but in drawing an analogy. I argue that using a linguistic expression meaningfully involves analogically extrapolating from our past experience of that expression, by observing a similarity between the present instance (that which the expression is being applied to) and previous instances (our past experiences involving the use of that expression). This is in opposition to the classical account of meaning, according to which meaning something by a linguistic expression involves following a rule – a rule stating necessary and jointly sufficient conditions for the expression to apply. I argue that there is no one thing that all meaningful instances of many linguistic expressions have in common, such that its meaning could be captured in the form of a rule. I claim that the categories corresponding to our linguistic expressions (containing the objects that any given expression is true of), are defined not in terms of necessary and jointly sufficient conditions, but in terms of family resemblance relationships between particular instances, such that analogy plays an essential role in every meaningful application of a linguistic expression. I argue that metaphorical uses of linguistic expressions are clearly dependent on analogy, and that as we are unable to uphold a principled distinction between the literal and the metaphorical, that all meaningful uses of language should be thought to depend on analogy. I argue that conceiving of meaning as governed by analogy, rather than rules, helps to diffuse the rule-following paradox, laid out by Saul Kripke. I claim that the meaning of every linguistic expression is governed by analogy, including the word ‘rule’, such that there may be scope to speak of ‘rules’ of meaning, after all.
Type
Thesis, MPhil Master of Philosophy
Collections
  • Philosophy Theses
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/18627

Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Advanced Search

Browse

All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunderThis CollectionBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunder

My Account

Login

Open Access

To find out how you can benefit from open access to research, see our library web pages and Open Access blog. For open access help contact: openaccess@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Accessibility

Read our Accessibility statement.

How to submit research papers

The full text of research papers can be submitted to the repository via Pure, the University's research information system. For help see our guide: How to deposit in Pure.

Electronic thesis deposit

Help with deposit.

Repository help

For repository help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Give Feedback

Cookie policy

This site may use cookies. Please see Terms and Conditions.

Usage statistics

COUNTER-compliant statistics on downloads from the repository are available from the IRUS-UK Service. Contact us for information.

© University of St Andrews Library

University of St Andrews is a charity registered in Scotland, No SC013532.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter