Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorStephens, W. Edryd
dc.contributor.authorde Falco, Bruna
dc.contributor.authorFiore, Alberto
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-08T12:31:59Z
dc.date.available2019-10-08T12:31:59Z
dc.date.issued2019-10-21
dc.identifier261443694
dc.identifier62fc31b4-d06a-42de-aa37-295cdb44a8d9
dc.identifier31515993
dc.identifier85072983611
dc.identifier000492118000015
dc.identifier.citationStephens , W E , de Falco , B & Fiore , A 2019 , ' A strategy for efficiently collecting aerosol condensate using silica fibers : application to carbonyl emissions from e-cigarettes ' , Chemical Research in Toxicology , vol. 32 , no. 10 , pp. 2053-2062 . https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00214en
dc.identifier.issn0893-228X
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-0884-8722/work/65013870
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/18626
dc.descriptionThe Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland and Cancer Research UK are thanked for providing funding to support this research.en
dc.description.abstractAnalyzing harmful constituents in e-cigarette aerosols typically involves adopting a methodology used for analyzing tobacco smoke. Cambridge filter pads (CFP) are the basis of numerous protocols for analyzing the various classes of compounds representing 93 harmful and potentially harmful constituents identified in tobacco smoke by the FDA. This paper describes a simplified method for trapping the low volatility components of e-cigarette aerosols using a single trapping procedure followed by physical extraction. The trap is a plug of amorphous silica fibers (0.75 g of 4 μm diameter) within a 10 mL syringe inserted between the e-cigarette mouthpiece and the pump of the vaping machine. The method is evaluated for emissions from three generations of e-cigarette device (Kangertech CE4, EVOD, and Subox Mini-C). On average, the silica wool traps about 94% of the vaporized liquid mass in the three devices and higher levels of condensate is retained before reaching saturation compared with CFP. The condensate is then physically extracted from the silica wool plug using a centrifuge. Condensate is then available for use directly in multiple analytical procedures or toxicological experiments. The method is tested by comparison with published analyses of carbonyls, among the most potent toxicants and carcinogens in e-cigarette emissions. Ranges for HPLC-DAD analyses of carbonyl-DNPH derivatives in a laboratory formulation of e-liquid are formaldehyde (0.182 ± 0.023 to 9.896 ± 0.709 μg puff–1), acetaldehyde (0.059 ± 0.005 to 0.791 ± 0.073 μg puff–1), and propionaldehyde (0.008 ± 0.0001 to 0.033 ± 0.023 μg puff–1); other carbonyls are identified and quantified. Carbonyl concentrations are also consistent with published experiments showing marked increases with variable power settings (10W to 50W). Compared with CFPs, e-cigarette aerosol collection by silica wool requires only one vaping session for multiple analyte groups, traps more condensate per puff, and collects more condensate before saturation.
dc.format.extent4344874
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofChemical Research in Toxicologyen
dc.subjectQD Chemistryen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subject.lccQDen
dc.titleA strategy for efficiently collecting aerosol condensate using silica fibers : application to carbonyl emissions from e-cigarettesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.sponsorCancer Research UKen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Earth & Environmental Sciencesen
dc.identifier.doi10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00214
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.grantnumberA25758en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record