Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorFumagalli, Matteo
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-04T08:30:03Z
dc.date.available2019-10-04T08:30:03Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-25
dc.identifier.citationFumagalli , M 2019 , ' Myanmar 2018 : botched transition and repatriation plan ' , Asia Maior , vol. XXIX , pp. 233-246 . < https://www.viella.it/rivista/9788833132419 >en
dc.identifier.issn2385-2526
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 257677614
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 3aafd1f8-8be2-415e-afe6-315b38978e94
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-1451-2088/work/60195962
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/18607
dc.description.abstractThe year was defined by the Rohingya crisis, which lingers on and remains unresolved. The agreement signed by the governments of Myanmar and Bangladesh in November 2017 had several aborted starts in 2018. Both governments came under the pressure of China to deal with the repatriation of the Rohingya refugees bilaterally, without the involvement of other (international) parties. What was evidently a forced repatriation plan was eventually halted in November. The outcry of human rights and refugee organisations continued unabated, as did western outrage against State Counsellor Aung San Suu Kyi, widely seen as callous and complicit in the military’s atrocities against the Rohingya. As ties with the United States worsened, China’s economic clout in Myanmar was consolidated, as evidenced by the expansion of economic projects and Beijing’s leverage on Nay Pyi Taw during the crisis. At home, however, Suu Kyi remained personally popular. Despite some efforts at rebooting, her government’s performance has oscillated between ineptitude and incompetence. Some personnel reshuffles and new strategic plans notwithstanding, its shortcomings remain well-known, being plagued by personalisation, the centralisation of decision-making and over-reliance on loyalty, to the detriment of expertise and professionalism. The NLD’s cohabitation with the military has continued, but no open rifts have thus far surfaced.
dc.format.extent14
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAsia Maioren
dc.rightsCopyright © 2019 Viella s.r.l. & Associazione Asia Maior. This work has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies or with permission. Permission for further reuse of this content should be sought from the publisher or the rights holder. This is the final published version of the work, which was originally published at https://www.viella.it/riviste/testata/14/en
dc.subjectMyanmaren
dc.subjectTransitionen
dc.subjectRepatriationen
dc.subjectBangladeshen
dc.subjectAung Saan Suu Kyien
dc.subjectRohingyaen
dc.subjectKachinen
dc.subjectShanen
dc.subjectPanglongen
dc.subjectPeace processen
dc.subjectTatmadawen
dc.subjectJZ International relationsen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subjectSDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutionsen
dc.subject.lccJZen
dc.titleMyanmar 2018 : botched transition and repatriation planen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of International Relationsen
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.viella.it/rivista/9788833132419en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record