Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBlum, Matthias
dc.contributor.authorMcLaughlin, Eoin
dc.contributor.authorHanley, Nick
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-01T23:37:23Z
dc.date.available2019-10-01T23:37:23Z
dc.date.issued2017-10-02
dc.identifier.citationBlum , M , McLaughlin , E & Hanley , N 2017 , ' Accounting for sustainable development over the long-run : lessons from Germany ' , German Economic Review , vol. Early View . https://doi.org/10.1111/geer.12148en
dc.identifier.issn1465-6485
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 250860114
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 35b17a13-6b1c-428d-b545-0f527a30c071
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85030485713
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000491553500014
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/18596
dc.descriptionWe thank the Leverhulme Trust for partly funding this work, under the project ‘History and the Future: predictive power of sustainable development indicators’.en
dc.description.abstractWe construct long-run sustainability indicators based on changes in Comprehensive Wealth – which we refer to as Genuine Savings - for Germany over the period 1850-2000. We find that German sustainability indicators are positive for the most part, although they are negative during and after the two World Wars and also the Great Depression. We also test the relationship between these wealth changes and a number of measures of well-being over the long-run: changes in consumption as well as changes in average height and infant mortality rates. We find a positive relationship between GS and our well-being indicators over different time horizons, however the relationship breaks down during WWII. We also test if the Genuine Savings/Comprehensive Wealth framework is able to cope with massive disinvestment at the end of World War 2 due to war-related destructions and dismantlement. We find that negative rates of Genuine Savings were by and large avoided due to the accumulation of technology and growth-friendly institutions. We demonstrate the importance of broader measures of capital, including measures of technological progress, and its role in the process of economic development; and the limits of conventional measures of investment to understand why future German consumption did not collapse.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofGerman Economic Reviewen
dc.rights© 2017 German Economic Association (Verein für Socialpolitik). This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/geer.12148en
dc.subjectSustainabilityen
dc.subjectEconomic developmenten
dc.subjectEconomic historyen
dc.subjectWorld War IIen
dc.subjectGenuine savingsen
dc.subjectInvestmenten
dc.subjectAnthropometricsen
dc.subjectConsumptionen
dc.subjectWell-beingen
dc.subjectGermanyen
dc.subjectHB Economic Theoryen
dc.subjectDD Germanyen
dc.subjectD731 World War IIen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subject.lccHBen
dc.subject.lccDDen
dc.subject.lccD731en
dc.titleAccounting for sustainable development over the long-run : lessons from Germanyen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Geography & Sustainable Developmenten
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/geer.12148
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2019-10-02


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record