Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorHumphris, Gerald Michael
dc.contributor.authorYang, Y
dc.contributor.authorBarracliffe, L
dc.contributor.authorCameron, J
dc.contributor.authorBedi, C
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-30T23:37:22Z
dc.date.available2019-09-30T23:37:22Z
dc.date.issued2018-10-01
dc.identifier.citationHumphris , G M , Yang , Y , Barracliffe , L , Cameron , J & Bedi , C 2018 , ' Emotional talk of patients with breast cancer during review appointments with therapeutic radiographers : effects on fears of cancer recurrence ' , Supportive Care in Cancer , vol. First online . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4484-7en
dc.identifier.issn0941-4355
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 255998686
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 50119422-976b-4e4f-af72-2d17519e3af1
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85054375331
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-4601-8834/work/64033921
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000466954400023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/18587
dc.descriptionFORECAST study supported generously by Breast Cancer Now (Reg. No. SP529).en
dc.description.abstractFears of cancer recurrence (FCR) in patients with breast cancer may develop during radiotherapy. Radiographer communication with their patients may influence early survivorship FCR level. Aim To investigate the management of emotional talk in patients with breast cancer attending their initial review appointments during radiotherapy and predict FCR at 6–8 weeks follow-up. Methods A mixed-methods observational study was conducted. Patients (consecutive sample, n = 60) with breast cancer, attending a major Scottish cancer centre, had their first two review appointments with their therapeutic radiographer (TR) audio-recorded. In addition, FCR was assessed (FCR7) at baseline and at 6–8 weeks following their final radiotherapy visit. Two TRs participated. Audio files were coded by the VR-CoDES system to identify emotional cues and therapeutic radiographer (TR) responses. Linear regression models were tested for fit and to identify factors associated with follow-up FCR, i.e. patient cues, responses by TR. Results Follow-up FCR was predicted negatively (robust estimator, p = .01) by level of patient emotional talk at the second review session. The provision of space by the TR, at the second session, to enable patients to expand their emotional utterances was also associated, but negatively (p = .01), with follow-up FCR. These effects were maintained after inclusion of covariates: age, treatment received and living conditions. Conclusions Patient’s emotional expression and TR responses at the second review meeting predicted follow-up FCR. The study shows the effect of communication processes on this specific distress component of the patient’s survivorship experience. Trial registration NCT02599506
dc.format.extent9
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofSupportive Care in Canceren
dc.rights© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created accepted version manuscript following peer review and as such may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4484-7en
dc.subjectBreast cancer patientsen
dc.subjectFears of recurrenceen
dc.subjectCommunicationen
dc.subjectEmotional talken
dc.subjectSurvivorshipen
dc.subjectDistressen
dc.subjectTherapeutic radiotherapyen
dc.subjectBehavioural codingen
dc.subjectHT Communities. Classes. Racesen
dc.subjectRC0254 Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology (including Cancer)en
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingen
dc.subject.lccHTen
dc.subject.lccRC0254en
dc.titleEmotional talk of patients with breast cancer during review appointments with therapeutic radiographers : effects on fears of cancer recurrenceen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Population and Behavioural Science Divisionen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. WHO Collaborating Centre for International Child & Adolescent Health Policyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Health Psychologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. St Andrews Sustainability Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Medicineen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4484-7
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2019-10-01


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record