St Andrews Research Repository

St Andrews University Home
View Item 
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  •   St Andrews Research Repository
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
  • View Item
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Living in the past : Thebes, periodization, and The Two Noble Kinsmen

Thumbnail
View/Open
Davis2010JnlMedievalEarlyModernStudies40_1.pdf (415.2Kb)
Date
2010
Author
Davis, Alexander Lee
Keywords
PR English literature
Metadata
Show full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Altmetrics DOI Statistics
Abstract
Our sense of the distinction between the "medieval" and the "early modern" is structured by two notions: that the early modern period is characterized by the death of a chivalric culture that is dominant in the medieval period; and that the early modern is distinguished from the medieval by its superior historical self-awareness. This essay reassesses these themes through a reading of Shakespeare and Fletcher's The Two Noble Kinsmen (1634). This is a play of knighthood and chivalric spectacle, adapted from Chaucer's Knight's Tale, which brings Chaucer on stage in the play's prologue. Reading the play through a tradition of "Theban" narratives that proliferated from antiquity through the Middle Ages shows that the representation of chivalric culture in The Two Noble Kinsmen constructs a vision of the past very different from how modern accounts distinguish between medieval and early modern cultures.
Citation
Davis , A L 2010 , ' Living in the past : Thebes, periodization, and The Two Noble Kinsmen ' , Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies , vol. 40 , no. 1 , pp. 173-195 . https://doi.org/10.1215/10829636-2009-018
Publication
Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies
Status
Peer reviewed
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/10829636-2009-018
ISSN
1082-9636
Type
Journal article
Rights
© 2010 by Duke University Press. This work is made available online in accordance with publisher policies. Published version also available from DOI: 10.1215/10829636-2009-018
Collections
  • English Research
  • St Andrews Institute of Mediaeval Studies Research
  • University of St Andrews Research
URL
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951037513&partnerID=8YFLogxK
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10023/1852

Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Advanced Search

Browse

All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunderThis CollectionBy Issue DateNamesTitlesSubjectsClassificationTypeFunder

My Account

Login

Open Access

To find out how you can benefit from open access to research, see our library web pages and Open Access blog. For open access help contact: openaccess@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Accessibility

Read our Accessibility statement.

How to submit research papers

The full text of research papers can be submitted to the repository via Pure, the University's research information system. For help see our guide: How to deposit in Pure.

Electronic thesis deposit

Help with deposit.

Repository help

For repository help contact: Digital-Repository@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Give Feedback

Cookie policy

This site may use cookies. Please see Terms and Conditions.

Usage statistics

COUNTER-compliant statistics on downloads from the repository are available from the IRUS-UK Service. Contact us for information.

© University of St Andrews Library

University of St Andrews is a charity registered in Scotland, No SC013532.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter