Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
White_Sarah_JEH_Accepted_Version.pdf
Size:
190.7Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Thomas Wolf c. Richard de Abingdon, 1293-1295 : a case study of legal argument

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorWhite, Sarah Beth
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-19T16:30:02Z
dc.date.available2019-09-19T16:30:02Z
dc.date.issued2020-01
dc.identifier258094495
dc.identifierf70fc7a0-399f-44b9-b090-de9d08f12a5e
dc.identifier85072320801
dc.identifier000509717400003
dc.identifier.citationWhite , S B 2020 , ' Thomas Wolf c. Richard de Abingdon, 1293-1295 : a case study of legal argument ' , Journal of Ecclesiastical History , vol. 71 , no. 1 , pp. 40-58 . https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022046919001155en
dc.identifier.issn0022-0469
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-4230-7276/work/74873050
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/18518
dc.descriptionThe project CLCLCL has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No. 740611)en
dc.description.abstractThis essay examines the legal arguments in Wolf c. Abingdon, a tithes dispute from 1293–5 between the rector and the vicar of Aldington, Kent. The case records contain explicit citations to written law, a surprising find in a seemingly minor case. The presence of explicit citations in particular suggests first that the litigants had access to legal assistance in the provincial court, and second that advocates and possibly judges were turning to written legal sources to resolve disputed points. This essay shows how the litigants' arguments were constructed and determines whether or not these arguments were effective in court.
dc.format.extent195288
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Ecclesiastical Historyen
dc.subjectBR Christianityen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccBRen
dc.titleThomas Wolf c. Richard de Abingdon, 1293-1295 : a case study of legal argumenten
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.sponsorEuropean Research Councilen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Historyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Institute of Legal and Constitutional Researchen
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0022046919001155
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2019-09-18
dc.identifier.grantnumber740611en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.