Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorLopez Jerez, Montserrat
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-18T14:30:04Z
dc.date.available2019-09-18T14:30:04Z
dc.date.issued2019-03-01
dc.identifier260822246
dc.identifiera6bfc97b-6469-442b-a1f0-c2072fe6858b
dc.identifier85116434789
dc.identifier.citationLopez Jerez , M 2019 , ' The rural transformation of the two rice bowls of Vietnam : the making of a new Asian miracle economy? ' , Innovation and Development , vol. Latest Articles . https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2019.1580939en
dc.identifier.issn2157-930X
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-7988-9049/work/60888294
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/18501
dc.description.abstractThis paper assesses the factors driving inclusiveness in Vietnam's rural transformation by comparing the two rice deltas of the country since reunification in 1975. In order to achieve this, a pro-poor institutional development approach based on Adelman is applied. We focus on asset-oriented, demand-generating and price-increasing interventions. Our findings point out that the experienced growth might be considered inclusive, but the dynamics of poverty reduction, income generation, and productivity-enhancement are substantially different in the two delta economies. This might have implications for the prospects of Vietnam's continuation in a ‘growth with equity’ model, if policies and innovations are not locally adjusted.
dc.format.extent18
dc.format.extent1826940
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofInnovation and Developmenten
dc.subjectRural transformationen
dc.subjectPro-poor growthen
dc.subjectVietnamen
dc.subjectInclusive innovationen
dc.subjectIshikawa curveen
dc.subjectD204 Modern Historyen
dc.subjectDS Asiaen
dc.subject3rd-DASen
dc.subjectBDCen
dc.subjectSDG 1 - No Povertyen
dc.subjectSDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructureen
dc.subject.lccD204en
dc.subject.lccDSen
dc.titleThe rural transformation of the two rice bowls of Vietnam : the making of a new Asian miracle economy?en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Historyen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/2157930X.2019.1580939
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record