Show simple item record

Files in this item


Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBoswell, K.
dc.contributor.authorCameron, H.
dc.contributor.authorWest, J.
dc.contributor.authorFleming, C.
dc.contributor.authorIbbotson, S.
dc.contributor.authorDawe, R.
dc.contributor.authorFoerster, J.
dc.identifier.citationBoswell , K , Cameron , H , West , J , Fleming , C , Ibbotson , S , Dawe , R & Foerster , J 2018 , ' Narrowband ultraviolet B treatment for psoriasis is highly economical and causes significant savings in cost for topical treatments ' , British Journal of Dermatology , vol. 179 , no. 5 , pp. 1148-1156 .
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 260534589
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 8dbb771e-ae7b-4b96-bebb-fb4a59bbb47a
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85051059181
dc.identifier.otherPubMed: 29901862
dc.description.abstractBackground: Narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) treatment for psoriasis is considered expensive. However, existing data are based on estimates and do not consider indirect cost savings. Objectives: To define the actual costs of NB-UVB incurred by the service provider, as well as treatment-associated cost savings. Methods: We performed data linkage of (i) comprehensive treatment records and (ii) prescribing data for all NB-UVB treatment episodes spanning 6 years in a population of 420 000. We minimized data fluctuation by compiling data from four independent treatment sites, and using drug prescriptions unrelated to psoriasis as a negative control. Results: National Health Service Tayside spent an average of £257 per NB-UVB treatment course (mean 257 ± 63, range 150–286, across four independent treatment sites), contrasting sharply with the estimate of £1882 used by the U.K. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. The cost of topical treatments averaged £128 per patient in the 12 months prior to NB-UVB, accounting for 42% of the overall drug costs incurred by these patients. This was reduced by 40% to £53 per patient over the 12-month period following NB-UVB treatment, while psoriasis-unrelated drug prescription remained unchanged, suggesting disease-specific effects of NB-UVB. The data were not due to site-specific factors, as confirmed by highly similar results observed between treatment sites operated by distinct staff. Finally, we detail all staff hours directly and indirectly involved in treatment, allowing direct translation of cost into other healthcare systems. Conclusions: NB-UVB is a low-cost treatment; cost figures currently used in health technology appraisals are an overestimate based on the data presented here. Creating or extending access to NB-UVB is likely to offer additional savings by delaying or avoiding costly third-line treatments for many patients.
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Dermatologyen
dc.rights© 2018 British Association of Dermatologists. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher's policies. This is the author created accepted version manuscript following peer review and as such may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at
dc.subjectRL Dermatologyen
dc.titleNarrowband ultraviolet B treatment for psoriasis is highly economical and causes significant savings in cost for topical treatmentsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Medicineen
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record