Files in this item
The double proximity paradox in peacebuilding : implementation and perception of the EU rule of law mission in Kosovo
Item metadata
dc.contributor.author | Osland, Kari M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Peter, Mateja | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-13T10:30:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-13T10:30:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier | 260334236 | |
dc.identifier | 885536c3-8328-4537-a253-f56f14748393 | |
dc.identifier | 000496142900006 | |
dc.identifier | 85102535415 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Osland , K M & Peter , M 2019 , ' The double proximity paradox in peacebuilding : implementation and perception of the EU rule of law mission in Kosovo ' , European Security , vol. 28 , no. 4 , pp. 493-512 . https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2019.1649658 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0966-2839 | |
dc.identifier.other | ORCID: /0000-0002-1822-6097/work/60427666 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10023/18302 | |
dc.description.abstract | This contribution increases the understanding of the EU's role in post-conflict settings by exploring perceptions of EULEX by local rule of law experts. Drawing on critical peacebuilding and the decline of normative power Europe literatures, we develop an analytical framework, underlining the importance of the intention–implementation gap and the implementation–perception gap in understanding how EU missions are perceived. By comparing local expert narratives to those of EULEX judges, prosecutors, and legal officers, we contend that the core problem for the negative perception of the mission results from what we call the double proximity paradox in peacebuilding. The first paradox is one of implementation and transpires when an actor commits substantial resources to address structural problems in a post-conflict territory due to its centrality for its own interests, but fails to uphold its commitment as its immediate interests can only be achieved through agents who contribute to these problems. The second paradox relates to perception and transpires as high commitments raise expectations of structural impact. The visibility of the actor's investment makes any implementation failures more tangible. The actor is therefore, paradoxically, the most open to criticism in a territory where it is doing the most. | |
dc.format.extent | 20 | |
dc.format.extent | 1597909 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | European Security | en |
dc.subject | EU | en |
dc.subject | Kosovo | en |
dc.subject | Rule of law | en |
dc.subject | Local perceptions | en |
dc.subject | Peacebuilding | en |
dc.subject | JZ International relations | en |
dc.subject | T-NDAS | en |
dc.subject.lcc | JZ | en |
dc.title | The double proximity paradox in peacebuilding : implementation and perception of the EU rule of law mission in Kosovo | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Centre for Global Law and Governance | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Institute of Legal and Constitutional Research | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. School of International Relations | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2019.1649658 | |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.