Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBuckland, S. T.
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, Alison
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-03T23:41:03Z
dc.date.available2019-08-03T23:41:03Z
dc.date.issued2017-10
dc.identifier.citationBuckland , S T & Johnston , A 2017 , ' Monitoring the biodiversity of regions : key principles and possible pitfalls ' , Biological Conservation , vol. 214 , pp. 23-34 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.07.034en
dc.identifier.issn0006-3207
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 250594810
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 6ff8680e-6b8b-4335-aa60-b8f87d6984c0
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85026788185
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000412788100004
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-9939-709X/work/73701041
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-8221-013X/work/103865987
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/18240
dc.descriptionThis work is based partly on Defra-funded research project BE0102 and available on the Defra Science website.en
dc.description.abstractThrough the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) 2010 and 2020 biodiversity targets, nations committed to reducing the rate of loss of biodiversity. This requires calculating the biodiversity trends in nations, whereas previously, most academic research on quantifying biodiversity concerned communities within relatively small sites. We consider design and analysis issues that CBD targets raise and explore the potential pitfalls for managers of monitoring schemes when statistical principles yield to practical constraints. We list five main criteria that well-designed monitoring programmes should meet: representative sampling locations, sufficient sample size, sufficient detections of target species, a representative sample of species, and a sound temporal sampling scheme. We examine the implications of biodiversity assessments that fail to meet these criteria and suggest ways to alleviate these implications through analytical approaches. We discuss the remarkable potential for wide-scale biodiversity monitoring offered by technological advances and by the rise of citizen science.
dc.format.extent12
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBiological Conservationen
dc.rights© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.07.034en
dc.subjectAnimal abundance estimationen
dc.subjectBiased sampleen
dc.subjectBiodiversity trendsen
dc.subjectConvention for Biological Diversity targetsen
dc.subjectGeometric meanen
dc.subjectRepresentative sampleen
dc.subjectGE Environmental Sciencesen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccGEen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleMonitoring the biodiversity of regions : key principles and possible pitfallsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Mathematics and Statisticsen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotlanden
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. St Andrews Sustainability Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Research into Ecological & Environmental Modellingen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Statisticsen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.07.034
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2019-08-04


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record