Files in this item
Indefinite proof and inversions of syllogisms
Item metadata
dc.contributor.author | Dyckhoff, Roy | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-25T15:30:01Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-25T15:30:01Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier | 255018325 | |
dc.identifier | ece1adaf-6c7f-4f4f-b2bc-b6e410546473 | |
dc.identifier | 85069643144 | |
dc.identifier | 000477058600003 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Dyckhoff , R 2019 , ' Indefinite proof and inversions of syllogisms ' , Bulletin of Symbolic Logic , vol. 25 , no. 2 , pp. 196-207 . https://doi.org/10.1017/bsl.2018.59 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1079-8986 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10023/18167 | |
dc.description.abstract | By considering the new notion of the inverses of syllogisms such as Barbara and Celarent, we show how the rule of Indirect Proof, in the form (no multiple or vacuous discharges) used by Aristotle, may be dispensed with, in a system comprising four basic rules of subalternation or conversion and six basic syllogisms. | |
dc.format.extent | 12 | |
dc.format.extent | 300216 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Bulletin of Symbolic Logic | en |
dc.subject | Deduction | en |
dc.subject | Syllogism | en |
dc.subject | Indirect proof | en |
dc.subject | BC Logic | en |
dc.subject | QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science | en |
dc.subject | T-NDAS | en |
dc.subject.lcc | BC | en |
dc.subject.lcc | QA75 | en |
dc.title | Indefinite proof and inversions of syllogisms | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. School of Computer Science | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Computational Algebra | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/bsl.2018.59 | |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.