Some memories are odder than others : Judgments of episodic oddity violate known decision rules
MetadataShow full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Altmetrics DOI Statistics
Current decision models of recognition memory are based almost entirely on one paradigm, single item old/new judgments accompanied by confidence ratings. This task results in receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) that are well fit by both signal-detection and dual-process models. Here we examine an entirely new recognition task, the judgment of episodic oddity, whereby participants select the mnemonically odd members of triplets (e.g., a new item hidden among two studied items). Using the only two known signal-detection rules of oddity judgment derived from the sensory perception literature, the unequal variance signal-detection model predicted that an old item among two new items would be easier to discover than a new item among two old items. In contrast, four separate empirical studies demonstrated the reverse pattern: triplets with two old items were the easiest to resolve. This finding was anticipated by the dual-process approach as the presence of two old items affords the greatest opportunity for recollection. Furthermore, a bootstrap-fed Monte Carlo procedure using two independent datasets demonstrated that the dual-process parameters typically observed during single item recognition correctly predict the current oddity findings, whereas unequal variance signal-detection parameters do not. Episodic oddity judgments represent a case where dual- and single-process predictions qualitatively diverge and the findings demonstrate that novelty is "odder" than familiarity.
O'Connor , A R , Guhl , E , Cox , J & Dobbins , I 2011 , ' Some memories are odder than others : Judgments of episodic oddity violate known decision rules ' , Journal of Memory and Language , vol. 64 , no. 4 , pp. 299-315 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.02.001
Journal of Memory and Language
This is an author version of an article published in Journal of Memory and Language 64(4), available at http://www.sciencedirect.com
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.