Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBaas, Jaco H.
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Megan L.
dc.contributor.authorMalarkey, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorBass, Sarah J.
dc.contributor.authorManning, Andrew J.
dc.contributor.authorHope, Julie A.
dc.contributor.authorPeakall, Jeffrey
dc.contributor.authorLichtman, Ian D.
dc.contributor.authorYe, Leiping
dc.contributor.authorDavies, Alan G.
dc.contributor.authorParsons, Daniel R.
dc.contributor.authorPaterson, David M.
dc.contributor.authorThorne, Peter D.
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-12T09:30:01Z
dc.date.available2019-06-12T09:30:01Z
dc.date.issued2019-12
dc.identifier.citationBaas , J H , Baker , M L , Malarkey , J , Bass , S J , Manning , A J , Hope , J A , Peakall , J , Lichtman , I D , Ye , L , Davies , A G , Parsons , D R , Paterson , D M & Thorne , P D 2019 , ' Integrating field and laboratory approaches for ripple development in mixed sand–clay–EPS ' , Sedimentology , vol. 66 , no. 7 , pp. 2749-2768 . https://doi.org/10.1111/sed.12611en
dc.identifier.issn0037-0746
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 258579183
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: baa6b6aa-50b1-452d-b23b-f531f7a27d5b
dc.identifier.otherRIS: urn:99D293EDD0ED5A4870BC3EDB76608B49
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-1174-6476/work/58531601
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85067438580
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000497136500008
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/17876
dc.descriptionThis work was supported by the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) under grant NE/I027223/1 (COHBED). DMP received funding from the Marine Alliance for Science and Technology for Scotland (MASTS), funded by the Scottish Funding Council (grant reference HR09011) and contributing institutions. AJM’s contribution to this manuscript was partly funded by HR Wallingford Company Research project ‘FineScale – Dynamics of Fine-grained Cohesive Sediments at Varying Spatial and Temporal Scales’ (DDY0523). JM and DRP were partially funded by a European Research Council Consolidator Award (725955).en
dc.description.abstractThe shape and size of sedimentary bedforms play a key role in the reconstruction of sedimentary processes in modern and ancient environments. Recent laboratory experiments have shown that bedforms in mixed sand–clay develop at a slower rate and often have smaller heights and wavelengths than equivalent bedforms in pure sand. This effect is generally attributed to cohesive forces that can be of physical origin, caused by electrostatic forces of attraction between clay minerals, and of biological origin, caused by ‘sticky’ extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) produced by micro‐organisms, such as microalgae (microphytobenthos) and bacteria. The present study demonstrates, for the first time, that these laboratory experiments are a suitable analogue for current ripples formed by tidal currents on a natural mixed sand–mud–EPS intertidal flat in a macrotidal estuary. Integrated hydrodynamic and bed morphological measurements, collected during a spring tide under weak wave conditions near Hilbre Island (Dee Estuary, north‐west England, UK), reveal a statistically significant decrease in current ripple wavelength for progressively higher bed mud and EPS contents, and a concurrent change from three‐dimensional linguoid to two‐dimensional straight‐crested ripple planform morphology. These results agree well with observations in laboratory flumes, but the rate of decrease of ripple wavelength as mud content increased was found to be substantially greater for the field than the laboratory. Since the formation of ripples under natural conditions is inherently more complex than in the laboratory, four additional factors that might affect current ripple development in estuaries, but which were not accounted for in laboratory experiments, were explored. These were current forcing, clay type, pore water salinity and bed EPS content. These data illustrate that clay type alone cannot explain the difference in the rate of decrease in ripple wavelength, because the bed clay contents were too low for clay type to have had a measurable effect on bedform development. Accounting for the difference in current forcing between the field and experiments, and therefore the relative stage of development with respect to equilibrium ripples, increases the difference between the ripple wavelengths. The presence of strongly cohesive EPS in the current ripples on the natural intertidal flat might explain the majority of the difference in the rate of decrease in ripple wavelength between the field and the laboratory. The effect of pore water salinity on the rate of bedform development cannot be quantified at present, but salinity is postulated herein to have had a smaller influence on the ripple wavelength than bed EPS content. The common presence of clay and EPS in many aqueous sedimentary environments implies that a re‐assessment of the role of current ripples and their primary current lamination in predicting and reconstructing flow regimes is necessary, and that models that are valid for pure sand are an inappropriate descriptor for more complex mixed sediment. This study proposes that this re‐assessment is necessary at all bed clay contents above 3%.
dc.format.extent20
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofSedimentologyen
dc.rights© 2019 The Authors. Sedimentology published by John Wiley Sons Ltd on behalf of International Association of Sedimentologists. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en
dc.subjectCohesionen
dc.subjectCurrent ripplesen
dc.subjectEstuaryen
dc.subjectIntertidal flaten
dc.subjectMixed sand–clay–EPSen
dc.subjectGC Oceanographyen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectGeologyen
dc.subjectStratigraphyen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subject.lccGCen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleIntegrating field and laboratory approaches for ripple development in mixed sand–clay–EPSen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Sediment Ecology Research Groupen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotlanden
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.St Andrews Sustainability Instituteen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/sed.12611
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record