Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorRutledge, Jonathan Curtis
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-04T15:30:05Z
dc.date.available2019-06-04T15:30:05Z
dc.date.issued2017-05-03
dc.identifier259113892
dc.identifier934f5268-ae2a-44e8-8f72-936e1cff4011
dc.identifier85049263643
dc.identifier000410149400010
dc.identifier.citationRutledge , J C 2017 , ' An epistemological corrective to doctrines of assurance ' , European Journal for Philosophy of Religion , vol. 9 , no. 1 , pp. 163-177 . https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v9i1.1869en
dc.identifier.issn1689-8311
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-9521-8031/work/58056134
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/17813
dc.description.abstractMany Christian traditions affirm a doctrine of assurance. According to this doctrine, those who are saved have assurance of their own salvation; that is, the doctrine of assurance tells us that the elect can know their status as elect. In this paper, I explore two developments of the doctrine of assurance by theologians (i.e. John Calvin & Kenneth Keathley) and argue that they fail to accommodate the fallibilistic nature of human knowing. I then develop a fallibilistic doctrine of assurance, which makes such assurance available to most Christians, and respond to an objection from the camp of pragmatic encroachment.
dc.format.extent2104990
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal for Philosophy of Religionen
dc.subjectAssuranceen
dc.subjectPragmatic Encroachmenten
dc.subjectSoteriologyen
dc.subjectSalvationen
dc.subjectSkepticismen
dc.subjectBL Religionen
dc.subjectB Philosophy (General)en
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccBLen
dc.subject.lccB1en
dc.titleAn epistemological corrective to doctrines of assuranceen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Divinityen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v9i1.1869
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record