Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorTello Ramos, Maria Cristina
dc.contributor.authorBranch, Carrie L
dc.contributor.authorKozlovsky, Dovid Y
dc.contributor.authorPitera, Angela M
dc.contributor.authorPravosudov, Vladimir V
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-27T23:38:05Z
dc.date.available2019-05-27T23:38:05Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationTello Ramos , M C , Branch , C L , Kozlovsky , D Y , Pitera , A M & Pravosudov , V V 2018 , ' Spatial memory and cognitive flexibility trade-offs : to be or not to be flexible, that is the question ' , Animal Behaviour , vol. In press , 7 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.02.019en
dc.identifier.issn0003-3472
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 252828544
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 8df658b1-70b2-422c-b188-0bae9e8bf4ee
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85044303536
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/17768
dc.descriptionAll authors were supported by National Science Foundation (NSF) grant IOS1351295 to V.V.P., and C.L.B. was supported by NSF grant DDIG 1600845.en
dc.description.abstractCognitive flexibility allows animals to readily acquire new information even when learning contingencies may rapidly change, as is the case in highly variable, but predictable, environments. While cognitive flexibility is broadly thought to be beneficial, animals exhibit inter- and intraspecific variation, with higher levels of flexibility associated with reduced memory retention and vice versa. In this review, we discuss when and why such variation may exist and focus specifically on memory and memory flexibility. We argue that retained memories may negatively affect the acquisition of new information, most likely via proactive interference, and available data suggest that there may be a trade-off between memory retention and acquiring new memories. We discuss neurogenesis-mediated forgetting as the mechanism reducing memory interference, as new neurons enhance learning new information but also cause forgetting of older memories. Selection may be expected to favour either end of the continuum between memory retention and memory flexibility depending on life history and environment. More stable environments may favour memory retention over flexibility whereas rapidly changing environments may favour flexibility over retention. Higher memory capacity also seems to be associated with higher memory interference, so higher neurogenesis rates associated with forgetting of unnecessary information may be favoured when higher capacity is beneficial such as in food-caching species. More research is necessary to understand whether inter- and intraspecific differences in the association between memory retention and flexibility are related to some general ecological patterns, whether this association is heritable, and whether developmental conditions and experience have different effects on this association in different species.
dc.format.extent8
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal Behaviouren
dc.rights© 2018, The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.02.019en
dc.subjectCognitive flexibilityen
dc.subjectReversal learningen
dc.subjectInterferenceen
dc.subjectForgettingen
dc.subjectNeurogenesisen
dc.subjectFood caching birdsen
dc.subjectMigratory birdsen
dc.subjectGE Environmental Sciencesen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccGEen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleSpatial memory and cognitive flexibility trade-offs : to be or not to be flexible, that is the questionen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Centre for Biological Diversityen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.02.019
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2019-05-28


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record