Skin deep? The stuff of adaptability and the intermediaries of science
Abstract
Rather than envisaging adaptation as a ‘palimpsestic thing’ following Hutcheon and O’Flynn, this article investigates the generative and regenerative operation of adaptability, determining the being and becoming of any natural, as well as cultural, production. By therefore considering adaptability as process and condition of all biological and intercultural renewal — importantly to include ‘big’ science and data — attention can turn in three interconnecting subsections to the ‘stuff’ of adaptability in its key dynamics: resilience, revitalization and recovery. By deliberately choosing natural science examples to illustrate each section, the article conducts a thought experiment in how Romance Studies research might fruitfully remind twenty-first-century sciences and information technologies of their intercultural roots, and that theirs are not superior, or distinctive, intellectual domains. The article then clarifies not only a co-equal place for Humanities’ insights, but also how these are already equipped to ascertain features of optimal adaptability for the greater potential enrichments of cultural and empirical research.
Citation
Orr , M 2017 , ' Skin deep? The stuff of adaptability and the intermediaries of science ' , Romance Studies , vol. 35 , no. 3 , pp. 144-160 . https://doi.org/10.1080/02639904.2017.1384652
Publication
Romance Studies
Status
Peer reviewed
ISSN
0263-9904Type
Journal article
Collections
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.