Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorLandler, Lukas
dc.contributor.authorRuxton, Graeme D.
dc.contributor.authorMalkemper, E. Pascal
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-14T15:30:02Z
dc.date.available2019-05-14T15:30:02Z
dc.date.issued2019-05-10
dc.identifier.citationLandler , L , Ruxton , G D & Malkemper , E P 2019 , ' Circular statistics meets practical limitations : a simulation-based Rao’s spacing test for non-continuous data ' , Movement Ecology , vol. 7 , 15 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-019-0160-xen
dc.identifier.issn2051-3933
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 258950688
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 42bffe8e-4619-4cf3-acea-8069ecd22415
dc.identifier.otherRIS: urn:1251A519E9CEA6B291DFBD780E8A8DE2
dc.identifier.otherRIS: Landler2019
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85065608204
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-8943-6609/work/60427507
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000467658800001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/17703
dc.description.abstractBackground: For data collected on a circular rather than linear scale, a very common procedure is to test whether the underlying distribution appears to deviate from circular uniformity. Rao’s spacing test is often used to evaluate the support the data offers for the null hypothesis of uniformity. Here we demonstrate that the traditional version of this test fails to adequately control type I error rate when the data is non-continuous (i.e. is rounded/grouped to a finite number of discrete values, e.g. to the nearest degree, a common situation). To overcome this issue, we provide a numerically-intensive simulation version of the test. Methods: We use a simulation study to explore the performance of the traditional and our novel variant on Rao’s spacing test, both in terms of control of type I error rate and statistical power. Results: When data is measured on a continuous circular scale then both methods offer good control of type I error and similar statistical power. If the data is rounded (even to a relatively fine scale such as to the nearest degree – giving 360 possible values), however, the traditional method produces highly inflated type I error rates, particularly with high sample sizes, that make it inappropriate for application to such data. In contrast, our simulation method retains good control of type I error while offering levels of statistical power similar to the traditional Rao test. Conclusions: The traditional method of applying Rao’s spacing test should be replaced by the simulation-based variant introduced here. The two methods offer similar performance but only the simulation method retains good control of the type I error rate when circular data is rounded to a finite set of values (likely due to limited precision of measuring equipment). Adoption of the simulation variant will substantially improve the reliability of this regularly-used test in the commonplace situation where data values are rounded.
dc.format.extent5
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofMovement Ecologyen
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en
dc.subjectCircular statisticsen
dc.subjectLimited precisionen
dc.subjectRayleigh testen
dc.subjectTesting for circular uniformityen
dc.subjectRandomisation testingen
dc.subjectStatistical poweren
dc.subjectOrianaen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectQA Mathematicsen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.subject.lccQAen
dc.titleCircular statistics meets practical limitations : a simulation-based Rao’s spacing test for non-continuous dataen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Biological Diversityen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-019-0160-x
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record