Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorSabetghadam, Anahid
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Xinlei
dc.contributor.authorBenzaqui, Marvin
dc.contributor.authorGkaniatsou, Effrosyni
dc.contributor.authorOrsi, Angelica
dc.contributor.authorLozinska, Magdalena M.
dc.contributor.authorSicard, Clemence
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Timothy
dc.contributor.authorSteunou, Nathalie
dc.contributor.authorWright, Paul A.
dc.contributor.authorSerre, Christian
dc.contributor.authorGascon, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorKapteijn, Freek
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-13T23:37:55Z
dc.date.available2019-05-13T23:37:55Z
dc.date.issued2018-06-04
dc.identifier.citationSabetghadam , A , Liu , X , Benzaqui , M , Gkaniatsou , E , Orsi , A , Lozinska , M M , Sicard , C , Johnson , T , Steunou , N , Wright , P A , Serre , C , Gascon , J & Kapteijn , F 2018 , ' Influence of filler pore structure and polymer on the performance of MOF-based mixed matrix membranes for CO 2 capture ' , Chemistry - A European Journal , vol. 24 , no. 31 , pp. 7949-7956 . https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201800253en
dc.identifier.issn0947-6539
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 252637838
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: f433bc12-e25e-4b5d-b239-79d9be3f7361
dc.identifier.othercrossref: 10.1002/chem.201800253
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85047390474
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000434216600021
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-4243-9957/work/62668285
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/17694
dc.descriptionFinancial support of the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013), M4CO2 project (608490) is gratefully acknowledged.en
dc.description.abstractTo gain insight into the influence of metal–organic framework (MOF) fillers and polymers on membrane performance, eight different composites were studied by combining four MOFs and two polymers. MOF materials (NH2‐MIL‐53(Al), MIL‐69(Al), MIL‐96(Al) and ZIF‐94) with various chemical functionalities, topologies, and dimensionalities of porosity were employed as fillers, and two typical polymers with different permeability‐selectivity properties (6FDA‐DAM and Pebax) were selected as matrices. The best‐performing MOF–polymer composites were prepared by loading 25 wt % of MIL‐96(Al) as filler, which improved the permeability and selectivity of 6FDA‐DAM to 32 and 10 %, while for Pebax they were enhanced to 25 and 18 %, respectively. The observed differences in membrane performance in the separation of CO2 from N2 are explained on the basis of gas solubility, diffusivity properties, and compatibility between the filler and polymer phases.
dc.format.extent8
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofChemistry - A European Journalen
dc.rights© 2018 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created accepted version manuscript following peer review and as such may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201800253en
dc.subjectMetal-organic frameworken
dc.subjectMembranesen
dc.subjectGas separationen
dc.subjectPolymersen
dc.subjectPore structureen
dc.subjectComposite materialsen
dc.subjectQD Chemistryen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subject.lccQDen
dc.titleInfluence of filler pore structure and polymer on the performance of MOF-based mixed matrix membranes for CO2 captureen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.sponsorEuropean Commissionen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Chemistryen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. EaSTCHEMen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201800253
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2019-05-14
dc.identifier.grantnumber608490en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record