Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBearzi, Giovanni
dc.contributor.authorKerem, Dan
dc.contributor.authorFurey, Nathan B.
dc.contributor.authorPitman, Robert L.
dc.contributor.authorRendell, Luke Edward
dc.contributor.authorReeves, Randall R.
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-08T23:37:16Z
dc.date.available2019-05-08T23:37:16Z
dc.date.issued2018-06
dc.identifier.citationBearzi , G , Kerem , D , Furey , N B , Pitman , R L , Rendell , L E & Reeves , R R 2018 , ' Whale and dolphin behavioural responses to dead conspecifics ' , Zoology , vol. 128 , pp. 1-15 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zool.2018.05.003en
dc.identifier.issn0944-2006
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 253076467
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 32e7c45e-4773-4446-8766-9a47a864fb41
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85048202978
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-1121-9142/work/60428001
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000440394000001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/17672
dc.description.abstractThe scientific study of death across animal taxa—comparative thanatology—investigates how animals respond behaviourally, physiologically and psychologically to dead conspecifics, and the processes behind such responses. Several species of cetaceans have been long known to care for, attend to, be aroused by, or show interest in dead or dying individuals. We investigated patterns and variation in cetacean responses to dead conspecifics across cetacean taxa based on a comprehensive literature review. We analysed 78 records reported between 1970 and 2016, involving 20 of the 88 extant cetacean species. We adopted a weighted comparative approach to take observation effort into account and found that odontocetes (toothed cetaceans) were much more likely than mysticetes (baleen whales) to attend to dead conspecifics. Dolphins (Delphinidae) had the greatest occurrence of attentive behaviour (92.3% of all records, with a weighed attendance index 18 times greater than the average of all other cetacean families). Two dolphin genera, Sousa and Tursiops, constituted 55.1% of all cetacean records (N = 43) and showed the highest incidence of attentive behaviour. Results of analyses intended to investigate the reasons behind these differences suggested that encephalisation may be an important predictor, consistent with the "social brain" hypothesis. Among attending individuals or groups of known sex (N = 28), the majority (75.0%) were adult females with dead calves or juveniles (possibly their own offspring, with exceptions), consistent with the strong mother-calf bond, or, in a few cases, with the bond between mothers and other females in the group. The remaining records (25.0%) involved males either showing sexual interest in a dead adult or subadult, or carrying a dead calf in the presence of females. Because an inanimate individual is potentially rescuable, responses to dead conspecifics—especially by females—can be explained at least in part by attempts to revive and protect, having a clear adaptive value. In some cases such responses are followed by apparently maladaptive behaviour such as the long-term carrying of, or standing by, a decomposed carcass, similar to observations of other terrestrial mammals. Among the possible explanations for the observed cetacean behavioural responses to dead conspecifics are strong attachment resulting in a difficulty of "letting go"—possibly related to grieving—or perhaps individuals failing to recognise or accept that an offspring or companion has died. Our current understanding is challenged by small sample size, incomplete descriptions, and lack of information on the physiology and neural processes underpinning the observed behaviour. We provide research recommendations that would improve such understanding.
dc.format.extent15
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofZoologyen
dc.rightsCopyright © 2018, Elsevier GmbH. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zool.2018.05.003en
dc.subjectCetaceansen
dc.subjectEpimeletic behaviouren
dc.subjectCaregiving behaviouren
dc.subjectComparative thanatologyen
dc.subjectGrievingen
dc.subjectQL Zoologyen
dc.subject3rd-DASen
dc.subject.lccQLen
dc.titleWhale and dolphin behavioural responses to dead conspecificsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Centre for Social Learning & Cognitive Evolutionen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Sea Mammal Research Uniten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotlanden
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Bioacoustics groupen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Centre for Biological Diversityen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.zool.2018.05.003
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2019-05-09
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0944200618300473en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record