Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorAbedifar, Pejman
dc.contributor.authorGiudici, Paolo
dc.contributor.authorHashem, Shatha Qamhieh
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-07T23:37:25Z
dc.date.available2019-05-07T23:37:25Z
dc.date.issued2017-12
dc.identifier.citationAbedifar , P , Giudici , P & Hashem , S Q 2017 , ' Heterogeneous market structure and systemic risk : evidence from dual banking systems ' , Journal of Financial Stability , vol. 33 , pp. 96-119 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2017.11.002en
dc.identifier.issn1572-3089
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 251523028
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: a26129c1-a421-4e4a-a690-c4d44c5c289b
dc.identifier.otherRIS: urn:329174FC9F0C534D6B6A4CCF980758EB
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85035144630
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000417189200007
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-7648-7201/work/64361307
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/17660
dc.descriptionThe authors acknowledge the financial support received from the PhD program in Economics and management of technology (DREAMT), at the University of Pavia.en
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates how banking system stability is affected when we combine Islamic and conventional finance under the same roof. We compare systemic resilience of three types of banks in six GCC member countries with dual banking systems: fully-fledged Islamic banks (IB), purely conventional banks (CB) and conventional banks with Islamic windows (CBw). We employ market-based systemic risk measures such as MES, SRISK and CoVaR to identify which sector is more vulnerable to a systemic event. We also compute weighted average GES to determine which sector is most synchronised with the market. Moreover, we use graphical network models to determine the most interconnected banking sector that can more easily spread a systemic shock to the whole system. Using a sample of observations on 79 publicly traded banks operating over the 2005–2014 period, we find that CBw is the least resilient sector to a systemic event, it has the highest synchronicity with the market, and it is the most interconnected banking sector during crisis times.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Financial Stabilityen
dc.rights© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2017.11.002en
dc.subjectGraphical network modelsen
dc.subjectIslamic bankingen
dc.subjectPartial correlationsen
dc.subjectSystemic risk measuresen
dc.subjectHB Economic Theoryen
dc.subjectHG Financeen
dc.subject3rd-NDASen
dc.subjectBDCen
dc.subject.lccHBen
dc.subject.lccHGen
dc.titleHeterogeneous market structure and systemic risk : evidence from dual banking systemsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Managementen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Responsible Banking and Financeen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2017.11.002
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2019-05-08


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record