Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorCotnoir, A. J.
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-06T23:37:12Z
dc.date.available2019-05-06T23:37:12Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationCotnoir , A J 2018 , ' Theism and dialetheism ' , Australasian Journal of Philosophy , vol. 96 , no. 3 , pp. 592-609 . https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2017.1384846en
dc.identifier.issn0004-8402
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 251493262
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 7e6a8d27-9ae5-49c5-896e-2299cd31d629
dc.identifier.otherRIS: urn:79FAB11E53D10714F700BE666ABB8151
dc.identifier.otherRIS: urn:79FAB11E53D10714F700BE666ABB8151
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85033395558
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000436575700014
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-4528-7570/work/65702601
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/17648
dc.description.abstractThe divine attributes of omniscience and omnipotence have faced objections to their very consistency. Such objections rely on reasoning parallel to semantic paradoxes such as the Liar or to set-theoretic paradoxes like Russell's paradox. With the advent of paraconsistent logics, dialetheismthe view that some contradictions are truebecame a major player in the search for a solution to such paradoxes. This paper explores whether dialetheism, armed with the tools of paraconsistent logics, has the resources to respond to the objections levelled against the divine attributes.
dc.format.extent18
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAustralasian Journal of Philosophyen
dc.rights© 2017 Australasian Association of Philosophy. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created accepted version manuscript following peer review and as such may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2017.1384846en
dc.subjectTheismen
dc.subjectDialetheismen
dc.subjectOmnipotenceen
dc.subjectOmniscienceen
dc.subjectParadoxen
dc.subjectParaconsistencyen
dc.subjectB Philosophy (General)en
dc.subjectBV Practical Theologyen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccB1en
dc.subject.lccBVen
dc.titleTheism and dialetheismen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Philosophyen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2017.1384846
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2019-05-07


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record