No evidence for audience effects in reciprocal cooperation of Norway rats
MetadataShow full item record
Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) cooperate according to indirect reciprocity, which implies the involvement of a reputation mechanism. Here, we test whether the rats employ such mechanism in repeated cooperative interactions. Focal subjects were first trained individually to pull food towards a social partner. During the experiment, the focal rats were confronted with two types of trained social partners: one always cooperated and the other one always defected, either in the presence or in the absence of an audience. Based on the hypotheses that the rats possess a reputation mechanism involving image scoring, we predicted them to be more helpful in the presence of an audience, independently of the partner's cooperative behaviour. If, in contrast, reputation involved a standing strategy, we predicted the rats to distinguish more between cooperators and defectors in the presence of an audience than in its absence. The rats helped cooperative partners more than defectors, but against both predictions the presence or absence of an audience did not influence their helping propensity. This indicates that either reputation is not included in the decision of rats to help an individual that has helped others, or that reputation is neither involving image scoring nor a standing strategy. Although the rats have been shown to modulate their decision to help a social partner based on its helpful behaviour towards others, they do not seem to adjust their behaviour strategically to the presence of an audience.
Schweinfurth , M K & Taborsky , M 2016 , ' No evidence for audience effects in reciprocal cooperation of Norway rats ' , Ethology , vol. 122 , no. 6 , pp. 513-521 . https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12499
Copyright © 2016 Blackwell Verlag GmbH. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12499
DescriptionFunding was provided by SNF grants 310030B_138660 and 31003A_156152 to Michael Taborsky.
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.