Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorWright, N. T. (Nicholas Thomas)
dc.contributor.authorRouvinez, Francis Aldo
dc.coverage.spatialx, 216 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-04T15:07:41Z
dc.date.available2019-04-04T15:07:41Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-25
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/17453
dc.description.abstractThis thesis argues that the Gospel of Mark reflects the assumptions, purposes, and conventions of ancient Jewish biographical writing rather than those of Greco-Roman biography. It offers a sustained critique of the view that the gospels are Greco-Roman biographies and argues that it is based on an exaggeration of the flexibility of the genre, insufficient attention to its most fundamental and distinctive characteristics, and an inadequate evaluation of the significance of resemblances and differences. It also seeks to remedy the hereto lack of adequate assessment of and comparison to the manner in which life and career stories are told in ancient Jewish literary traditions. Chapter 1 offers a review of the conditions that have proved favourable to the emergence and endurance of the current consensus. Chapter 2 proposes a fresh analysis of Greco-Roman biography between 200 BCE and 100 CE. It gives close attention to the modes of representation of the genre, as well as its philosophical and cultural underpinnings, with relevant substantiation from the works of the main authors of the period. Chapters 3 and 4 bring to light the strong Jewish biographical tradition that exists both in the Jewish Scriptures and Second Temple literature. A typology of these biographies is proposed which delineates their conventions, topoi, and lines of development. An analysis of later Jewish adaptations to the cultural expectations of Greco-Roman audiences and the conventions of Greco-Roman biography is also included. Chapter 5 demonstrates that the ethos, narration, and style of Mark conform to those of Jewish biography. Finally, chapters 6, 7, and 8 evaluate leading interpretations of Mark’s introduction, main narrative, and Passion Narrative through the lens of Greco-Roman biography. Each of these chapters then demonstrates Mark’s use of modes of representation and categories of content typical of Jewish biography to present Jesus as the fusion of biblical prototypical figures and the embodiment of messianically-interpreted texts from the Jewish Scriptures.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.subjectJesus Christ -- Biography -- History and criticism.en_US
dc.subjectGreek literature -- History and criticism.en_US
dc.subjectBiography as a literary form.en_US
dc.subjectReligious biography -- History and criticism.en_US
dc.subjectGreek literature -- Relation to the New Testament.en_US
dc.subjectGreek literature, Hellenistic -- History and criticism.en_US
dc.subjectBible. N.T. Gospels. -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.en_US
dc.subjectBible. N.T. Gospels. -- Language, style.en_US
dc.subjectBible. N.T. Mark. -- Criticism, interpretation etc.en_US
dc.subjectBible. Mark -- Criticism, Narrative.en_US
dc.subjectBible. N.T. Mark -- Relation to the Old Testament.en_US
dc.subjectBible. O.T. -- Relation to Mark.en_US
dc.subjectJesus Christ -- Person and offices.en_US
dc.subjectBible. Old Testament -- Biographyen
dc.subject.lcshBible. Mark--Criticism, interpretation, etc.en
dc.subject.lcshBible. Mark--Criticism, Narrativeen
dc.subject.lcshBible. Mark--Relation to the Old Testamenten
dc.subject.lcshBible. O. T.--Relation to Marken
dc.subject.lcshJesus Christ--Biography--History and criticismen
dc.subject.lcshGreek literature, Hellenistic--History and criticismen
dc.subject.lcshBiography as a literary formen
dc.subject.lcshReligious biography--History and criticismen
dc.subject.lcshGreek literature--Relation to the New Testamenten
dc.subject.lcshJesus Christ--Person and officesen
dc.titleThe Gospel of Mark in the context of ancient biographyen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.publisher.departmentSchool of Divinityen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/10023-17453


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record