Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBhattacharya, Atanu
dc.contributor.authorBolch, Tobias
dc.contributor.authorMukherjee, Kriti
dc.contributor.authorPieczonka, Tino
dc.contributor.authorKropacek, Jan
dc.contributor.authorBuchroithner, Manfred F.
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-13T15:30:10Z
dc.date.available2019-03-13T15:30:10Z
dc.date.issued2016-12
dc.identifier258136574
dc.identifierb16879c7-201e-4fce-909d-30bd278186a2
dc.identifier84995532870
dc.identifier000389173500012
dc.identifier.citationBhattacharya , A , Bolch , T , Mukherjee , K , Pieczonka , T , Kropacek , J & Buchroithner , M F 2016 , ' Overall recession and mass budget of Gangotri Glacier, Garhwal Himalayas, from 1965 to 2015 using remote sensing data ' , Journal of Glaciology , vol. 62 , no. 236 , pp. 1115-1133 . https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.96 , https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.96en
dc.identifier.issn0022-1430
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-8201-5059/work/55379167
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/17279
dc.description.abstractThinning rates for the debris-covered Gangotri Glacier and its tributary glaciers during the period 1968-2014, length variation and area vacated at the snout from 1965 to 2015, and seasonal variation of ice-surface velocity for the last two decades have been investigated in this study. It was found that the mass loss of Gangotri and its tributary glaciers was slightly less than those reported for other debris-covered glaciers in the Himalayan regions. The average velocity during 2006-14 decreased by ~6.7% as compared with that during 1993-2006. The debris-covered area of the main trunk of Gangotri Glacier increased significantly from 1965 until 2015 with the maximum rate of increase (0.8 ± 0.2 km2 a-1) during 2006-15. The retreat (~9.0 ± 3.5 m a-1) was less in recent years (2006-2015) but the down-wasting (0.34 ± 0.2 m a-1) in the same period (2006-2014) was higher than that (0.20 ± 0.1 m a-1) during 1968-2006. The study reinforced the established fact that the glacier length change is a delayed response to climate change and, in addition, is affected by debris cover, whereas glacier mass balance is a more direct and immediate response. Therefore, it is recommended to study the glacier mass balance and not only the glacier extent, to conclude about a glacier's response to climate change.
dc.format.extent19
dc.format.extent1945197
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Glaciologyen
dc.subjectCorona and hexagon dataen
dc.subjectGlacier mass balanceen
dc.subjectGlacier retreaten
dc.subjectGlacier surface velocityen
dc.subjectGE Environmental Sciencesen
dc.subjectEarth-Surface Processesen
dc.subject3rd-DASen
dc.subjectSDG 13 - Climate Actionen
dc.subject.lccGEen
dc.titleOverall recession and mass budget of Gangotri Glacier, Garhwal Himalayas, from 1965 to 2015 using remote sensing dataen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Geography & Sustainable Developmenten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Bell-Edwards Geographic Data Instituteen
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/jog.2016.96
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record