Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorSpencer, C. J.
dc.contributor.authorKirkland, C. L.
dc.contributor.authorPrave, A. R.
dc.contributor.authorStrachan, R. A.
dc.contributor.authorPease, V.
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-27T12:30:05Z
dc.date.available2019-02-27T12:30:05Z
dc.date.issued2019-03
dc.identifier256289926
dc.identifier83eb09d7-2495-4086-8f59-a453cbb0a62f
dc.identifier85056447869
dc.identifier000459141200007
dc.identifier.citationSpencer , C J , Kirkland , C L , Prave , A R , Strachan , R A & Pease , V 2019 , ' Crustal reworking and orogenic styles inferred from zircon Hf isotopes : Proterozoic examples from the North Atlantic region ' , Geoscience Frontiers , vol. 10 , no. 2 , pp. 417-424 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2018.09.008en
dc.identifier.issn1674-9871
dc.identifier.otherRIS: urn:9EB3507406EBC48DAC6F44ADBB42FAF1
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-4614-3774/work/64033717
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/17162
dc.descriptionVP acknowledges funding from the Swedish Research Council (Grant 621-2014-4375).en
dc.description.abstractZircon Hf evolutionary patterns are powerful tools that are frequently used to elucidate magma petrogenesis and crustal evolution. After an initial rock forming fractionation event, the 176Hf/177Hf isotopic signature of a rock is modified through ingrowth of radiogenic Hf, dependent on the 176Lu/177Hf ratio. This fractionation process can be modelled to derive an estimation of the time when mantle extraction may have occurred. Additionally, Hf evolution trends can be used to diagnose closed system reworking where successive samples through time define an Hf evolution array dependant on the source Lu/Hf ratio. However, it is widely recognized that many magmatic events require new mantle addition as the thermal impetus for melting pre-existing crust. In this situation, rather than simply reflecting reworking, the isotopic signature indicates mixing with contributions from both reworked crust and new radiogenic input. Different geodynamic settings have different propensities for either reworking or addition of new mantle-derived magma. Hence, Hf-time trends carry within them are cord, albeit cryptic, of the evolving geodynamic environment as different tectonic configurations recycle and add new crust at different rates, magnitudes, and from different sources. As an example of the difference in apparent Hf evolution slopes, we present Hf-time compilations from three geographically distinct orogens in the North Atlantic Region whose geodynamic configurations remain speculative. We use the εHf/Ma trajectory to assist in understanding their evolution. The εHf/Ma trajectory of the Sveconorwegian Orogen corresponds to a 176Lu/177Hf ratio of 0.012, which implies a process driven primarily by reworking of pre-existing crust that is balanced with input from the depleted mantle resulting in a relatively shallow εHf/Ma slope. The Valhalla Orogen reveals a similar comparatively shallow εHf/Ma path. In stark contrast to these patterns is the steep εHf/Ma trajectory of the Grenville Orogen that requires a mixing process involving a greater contribution of old crust of at least ∼1.8 Ga age. The degree of reworking required to produce the εHf/Ma trend of the Grenville Orogen is consistent with a continent-continent collisional orogeny whereas both Sveconorwegian and Valhalla orogens appear more consistent with accretionary margins.
dc.format.extent918062
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofGeoscience Frontiersen
dc.subjectZirconen
dc.subjectHfen
dc.subjectCrustal evolutionen
dc.subjectGrenvilleen
dc.subjectSveconorwegianen
dc.subjectValhallaen
dc.subjectGE Environmental Sciencesen
dc.subjectQE Geologyen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subject.lccGEen
dc.subject.lccQEen
dc.titleCrustal reworking and orogenic styles inferred from zircon Hf isotopes : Proterozoic examples from the North Atlantic regionen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Earth & Environmental Sciencesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotlanden
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. St Andrews Sustainability Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. St Andrews Isotope Geochemistryen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.gsf.2018.09.008
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record