Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.advisorBall, Derek Nelson
dc.contributor.advisorDever, Josh
dc.contributor.authorMankowitz, Poppy
dc.coverage.spatial[4], 167 p.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-22T12:50:34Z
dc.date.available2019-02-22T12:50:34Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-24
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/17137
dc.description.abstractLinguists and philosophers of language have shown increasing interest in the expressions that refer to quantifiers: determiners like ‘every’ and ‘many’, in addition to determiner phrases like ‘some king’ and ‘no cat’. This thesis addresses several puzzles where the way we understand quantifier expressions depends on features that go beyond standard truth conditional semantic meaning. One puzzle concerns the fact that it is often natural to understand ‘Every king is in the yard’ as being true if (say) all of the kings at the party are in the yard, even though the standard truth conditions predict it to be true if and only if every king in the universe is in the yard. Another puzzle emerges from the observation that ‘Every American king is in the yard’ sounds odd relative to contexts where there are no American kings, even though the standard truth conditions predict it to be trivially true. These puzzles have been widely discussed within linguistics and philosophy of language, and have implications for topics as diverse as the distinction between semantics and pragmatics and the ontological commitments of ordinary individuals. Yet few attempts have been made to incorporate discussions from the linguistics literature into the philosophical literature. This thesis argues that attending to the linguistics literature helps to address these puzzles. In particular, my solutions to these puzzles rely on notions from work on information structure, an often overlooked area of linguistics. I will use these notions to develop a new theory of the pragmatics of ordinary discourse, in the process of resolving the puzzles. In the first two chapters, I provide accessible overviews of key notions from the literature on quantifier expressions and information structure. In the third chapter, I discuss the problem of contextual domain restriction. In the fourth chapter, I consider the problems posed by empty restrictors. In the final chapter, I tackle the issue of category mistakes.en_US
dc.description.sponsorship"This work was supported by the Universities of St Andrews and Stirling (SASP PhD Scholarship), and the Royal Institute of Philosophy (Jacobsen Studentship)." -- p. 1en
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of St Andrews
dc.subjectQuantifier expressionsen_US
dc.subjectInformation structureen_US
dc.subjectLanguageen_US
dc.subjectSemanticsen_US
dc.subjectPragmaticsen_US
dc.subject.lccP299.Q3M2
dc.subject.lcshGrammar, Comparative and general--Quantifiersen
dc.subject.lcshSemantics (Philosophy)en
dc.subject.lcshPragmaticsen
dc.titleQuantifier expressions and information structureen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.sponsorSt Andrews and Stirling Graduate Programme in Philosophy (SASP)en_US
dc.contributor.sponsorRoyal Institute of Philosophyen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_US
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisher.institutionThe University of St Andrewsen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17630/10023-17137


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record