Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorDeary, Holly
dc.contributor.authorWarren, Charles R.
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-19T00:33:28Z
dc.date.available2019-02-19T00:33:28Z
dc.date.issued2019-02-23
dc.identifier.citationDeary , H & Warren , C R 2019 , ' Trajectories of rewilding : a taxonomy of wildland management ' , Journal of Environmental Planning and Management , vol. 62 , no. 3 , pp. 466-491 . https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1425134en
dc.identifier.issn0964-0568
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 252017154
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: b5108590-8612-4324-92bb-0edc60dd4290
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85042212755
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-4449-4068/work/60195855
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000470326900006
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/17090
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/uXwF7xbE4uD49X5tgFiB/fullen
dc.descriptionThe research was funded by the Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland.en
dc.description.abstractRewilding, though a young term, already has numerous meanings. We use Q-methodology to investigate understandings and practices of rewilding amongst managers of wildland on 17 estates in the Scottish uplands. The estates, covering 207,200 ha, include all the main land ownership types in Scotland. All respondents value wildness and biodiversity highly, but the Q-study reveals significant divergence in the interpretations and practices of rewilding, especially concerning (i) the value of naturalness, (ii) the use of management interventions, (iii) the value of cultural heritage and traditional land uses, and (iv) the place of people within wildland. A tripartite taxonomy of wildland management approaches is developed, identifying three ‘centres of gravity’ along the continuum of viewpoints, emphasising respectively nature’s autonomy, active restoration, and the maintainance of wildness within cultural landscapes. The taxonomy provides an analytic framework for evaluating the diverse and often conflicting aspirations for the management of wild places.
dc.format.extent26
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Environmental Planning and Managementen
dc.rightsCopyright © 2018 Newcastle University. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1425134en
dc.subjectQ-methodologyen
dc.subjectRewildingen
dc.subjectScotlanden
dc.subjectTaxonomyen
dc.subjectWildlanden
dc.subjectGE Environmental Sciencesen
dc.subjectHD28 Management. Industrial Managementen
dc.subject3rd-NDASen
dc.subjectBDCen
dc.subjectR2Cen
dc.subject.lccGEen
dc.subject.lccHD28en
dc.titleTrajectories of rewilding : a taxonomy of wildland managementen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Geography & Sustainable Developmenten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.St Andrews Sustainability Instituteen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1425134
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2019-02-19


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record