Undergraduate students who are required to withdraw from university : the role of ethnicity
MetadataShow full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Altmetrics DOI Statistics
A large body of international research focuses on identifying reasons why students do not ‘persist’ (Tinto 2007) within higher education. Little research has focused on students whose leaving is non-voluntary and where narratives of ‘persistence’ are therefore not as pertinent. This article seeks to refocus some of the attention onto the distinct group of students who do not elect to leave their studies but who are, instead, required to withdraw; in English higher education, such students leave under ‘Academic Fail’ and ‘Exclusion’ categories. More specifically, it explores the relationship between student leavers’ ethnicity and their likelihood of being required to withdraw. Utilising a large dataset comprising UK-domiciled undergraduate students enrolled to take a degree within an English HEI in 2010-11, it finds that most groups of Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) students are more likely to be required to withdraw than White students. Ethnicity exerts an independent impact on a student’s likelihood of being required to withdraw, when other background and on-course characteristics are controlled for, but this impact varies by disciplinary area. It is suggested that these findings implicate factors within the HE sector itself as key drivers in the process that leads to students being required to withdraw. Lessons are drawn out for those tasked with managing the student experience within higher education.
Woodfield , R 2017 , ' Undergraduate students who are required to withdraw from university : the role of ethnicity ' , British Educational Research Journal , vol. 43 , no. 2 , pp. 230-252 . https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3259
British Educational Research Journal
Copyright © 2017, British Educational Research Association. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3259
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.