Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBacon, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorUzquiano, Gabriel
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-31T00:33:34Z
dc.date.available2019-01-31T00:33:34Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-31
dc.identifier.citationBacon , A & Uzquiano , G 2018 , ' Some results on the limits of thought ' Journal of Philosophical Logic , vol. In press . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-018-9458-1en
dc.identifier.issn0022-3611
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 252030324
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 9a3cdc49-ce6a-456f-a78e-c9737b6e7677
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85056453620
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/16967
dc.description.abstractGeneralizing on some arguments due to Arthur Prior and Dmitry Mirimanoff, we provide some further limitative results on what can be thought.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Philosophical Logicen
dc.rights© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created accepted version manuscript following peer review and as such may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-018-9458-1en
dc.subjectPrior’s paradoxen
dc.subjectRussell’s paradoxen
dc.subjectKaplan’s paradoxen
dc.subjectMiriminoff’s paradoxen
dc.subjectBC Logicen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccBCen
dc.titleSome results on the limits of thoughten
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Philosophical, Anthropological and Film Studiesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Philosophyen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-018-9458-1
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil31-01-20


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record