Opening the black box of scholarly communication funding : a public data infrastructure for financial flows in academic publishing
View/ Open
Date
11/04/2016Metadata
Show full item recordAltmetrics Handle Statistics
Altmetrics DOI Statistics
Abstract
‘Public access to publicly funded research’ has been one of the rallying calls of the global open access movement. Governments and public institutions around the world have mandated that publications supported by public funding sources should be publicly accessible. Publishers are experimenting with new models to widen access. Yet financial flows underpinning scholarly publishing remain complex and opaque. In this article we present work to trace and reassemble a picture of financial flows around the publication of journals in the UK in the midst of a national shift towards open access. We contend that the current lack of financial transparency around scholarly communication is an obstacle to evidence-based policy-making – leaving researchers, decision-makers and institutions in the dark about the systemic implications of new financial models. We conclude that obtaining a more joined up picture of financial flows is vital as a means for researchers, institutions and others to understand and shape changes to the sociotechnical systems that underpin scholarly communication.
Citation
Lawson , S , Gray , J & Mauri , M 2016 , ' Opening the black box of scholarly communication funding : a public data infrastructure for financial flows in academic publishing ' , Open Library of Humanities , vol. 2 , no. 1 , e10 , pp. 1-35 . https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.72
Publication
Open Library of Humanities
Status
Peer reviewed
ISSN
2056-6700Type
Journal article
Rights
Copyright: © 2016 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication 1.0 Universal License (CC0 1.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium. See https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/.
Description
Parts of this research were supported through a grant from the Open Society Foundations (OSF) as well as through the EU FP7 co-financed PASTEUR4OA (Open Access Policy Alignment Strategies for European Union Research) project.Collections
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.