Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorFyfe, Aileen
dc.contributor.authorMcDougall-Waters, Julie
dc.contributor.authorMoxham, Noah
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-24T09:30:05Z
dc.date.available2019-01-24T09:30:05Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-01
dc.identifier.citationFyfe , A , McDougall-Waters , J & Moxham , N 2018 , ' Credit, copyright, and the circulation of scientific knowledge : the Royal Society in the long nineteenth century ' Victorian Periodicals Review , vol. 51 , no. 4 , pp. 597-615 . https://doi.org/10.1353/vpr.2018.0045en
dc.identifier.issn1712-526X
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 256169144
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: be0f6177-f1ca-4813-82bd-6b8f8a16fdb3
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-6794-4140/work/55643888
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/16928
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we consider the Royal Society's attitudes towards the copying, reprinting, and reuse of material from its Philosophical Transactions during the long nineteenth century. The contents of the Transactions circulated in print in a variety of ways beyond its traditional biannual parts and bound annual volumes. This included the private circulation of authors' separate copies of papers; the reissuing of papers in authors' collected works; the incorporation of material into other books; and the reporting and excerpting of material in the general scientific periodical literature. The Royal Society attempted to protect the originality and priority of the research published under its imprint, but it never sought to use copyright legislation to prevent (or to profit from) the reprinting or reuse of its research. We argue that copyright was in fact a poor tool for learned institutions like the Royal Society, which were more concerned with reputational credit than with financial credit and were adept at managing the delicate balance between institutional interests and those of individual authors. We demonstrate that the Royal Society's approach to reprinting and reuse was based on the philanthropic concept of a scholarly common good. It typically relied on a code of conduct enforced through tradition and moral suasion, rather than legislation.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofVictorian Periodicals Reviewen
dc.rightsCopyright © 2018 The Research Society for Victorian Periodicals. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created accepted version manuscript following peer review and as such may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1353/vpr.2018.0045en
dc.subjectAS Academies and learned societies (General)en
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccASen
dc.titleCredit, copyright, and the circulation of scientific knowledge : the Royal Society in the long nineteenth centuryen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Historyen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1353/vpr.2018.0045
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil23-01-20


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record