Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBarracliffe, L
dc.contributor.authorYang, Y
dc.contributor.authorCameron, J
dc.contributor.authorBedi, C
dc.contributor.authorHumphris, G.
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-09T00:33:31Z
dc.date.available2019-01-09T00:33:31Z
dc.date.issued2018-03
dc.identifier.citationBarracliffe , L , Yang , Y , Cameron , J , Bedi , C & Humphris , G 2018 , ' Does emotional talk vary with fears of cancer recurrence trajectory? A content analysis of interactions between women with breast cancer and their therapeutic radiographers ' , Journal of Psychosomatic Research , vol. 106 , pp. 41-48 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.01.004en
dc.identifier.issn0022-3999
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 252008596
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 9c2cb923-dfef-407a-93f0-33e205d3b4d0
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85040323871
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000426335100006
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-4601-8834/work/64033837
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/16804
dc.descriptionFunding: Breast Cancer Now (grant number 6873).en
dc.description.abstractFears of cancer recurrence (FCR) in patients with breast cancer are hypothesised to develop over the period from diagnosis, through treatment and thereafter. A crucial point may be the contact that patients have with their therapeutic radiographer in review appointments. The study aimed to (1) describe and categorise the content of the identified emotional talk, and (2) consider the evidence for an association of content with FCR trajectory. Methods: A concurrent mixed methods approach was applied as part of a larger investigation (FORECAST) of breast cancer patients (n = 87). Patients completed a daily diary during their radiotherapy treatment. Audio recordings were collected of review appointments. The Verona Coding Definitions of Emotional Sequences (VR-CoDES) system was used to code patient emotional cues and concerns (CCs). Purposeful sampling of the daily diary ratings identified 12 patients (30 consultations) with an increasing (n=6) or decreasing (n=6) FCR trajectory. The emotional talk of these patients at their weekly reviews was content analysed. Results: Four themes were identified from 185 CCs: Physical Symptoms, Factors External to Hospital, Treatment, and Labelling Cancer. FCR decreasing trajectory group consultations were longer (p < 0.02), expressed twice as many CCs as the increasing trajectory group (p < 0.001), and were more likely to refer to cancer directly (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The emotional content expressed matched features outlined in the Lee-Jones et al (1997) FCR model, and showed evidence of avoidance in increasing FCR trajectory patients.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Psychosomatic Researchen
dc.rights© 2018, Published by Elsevier. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.01.004en
dc.subjectBF Psychologyen
dc.subjectRC0254 Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology (including Cancer)en
dc.subjectRC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatryen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingen
dc.subject.lccBFen
dc.subject.lccRC0254en
dc.subject.lccRC0321en
dc.titleDoes emotional talk vary with fears of cancer recurrence trajectory? A content analysis of interactions between women with breast cancer and their therapeutic radiographersen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Medicineen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Population and Behavioural Science Divisionen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. WHO Collaborating Centre for International Child & Adolescent Health Policyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Health Psychologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. St Andrews Sustainability Instituteen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.01.004
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2019-01-09


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record