Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorBoulton, Rebecca A
dc.contributor.authorCook, Nicola
dc.contributor.authorGreen, Jade
dc.contributor.authorGreenway, Elisabeth Virginia
dc.contributor.authorShuker, David Michael
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-10T09:37:18Z
dc.date.available2018-12-10T09:37:18Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-13
dc.identifier.citationBoulton , R A , Cook , N , Green , J , Greenway , E V & Shuker , D M 2018 , ' Sperm blocking is not a male adaptation to sperm competition in a parasitoid wasp ' , Behavioral Ecology , vol. 29 , no. 1 , pp. 253-263 . https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arx156en
dc.identifier.issn1045-2249
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 251399787
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: f49d51e6-6a6e-4d7c-a54d-12ddc2f7ade8
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85040809544
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-4462-0116/work/60427604
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000422957500035
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/16648
dc.descriptionThis work was supported by a NERC Doctoral Training Grant studentship to RAB. Data archived in Dryad Digital Repository at doi:10.5061/dryad.t0877en
dc.description.abstractThe extent to which sperm or ejaculate-derived products from different males interact during sperm competition—from kamikaze sperm to sperm incapacitation—remains controversial. Repeated matings in the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis lead to a short-term reduction of efficient sperm use by females, which is crucial for a haplodiploid organism when needing to allocate sex adaptively (i.e. by fertilizing eggs to produce daughters). Repeated matings by females in this species, therefore, constrain sex allocation through this “sperm-blocking” effect, eliciting a cost to polyandry. Here, we explore the causes and consequences of sperm blocking and test the hypothesis that it is an ejaculate-related trait associated with sperm competition. First, we show that sperm blocking, which leads to an overproduction of sons, is not correlated with success in either offensive or defensive roles in sperm competition. Then, we show that the extent of sperm blocking is not affected by self–self or kin–kin ejaculate interactions when compared to self vs nonself or kin versus nonkin sperm competition. Our results suggest that sperm blocking is not a sperm competition adaptation, but is instead associated with the mechanics of processing sperm in this species, which are likely shaped by selection on female reproductive morphology for adaptive sex allocation.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBehavioral Ecologyen
dc.rights© 2017, the Author(s). This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arx156en
dc.subjectSperm competitionen
dc.subjectPost-copulatory sexual selectionen
dc.subjectPolyandryen
dc.subjectSex allocationen
dc.subjectLocal mate competitionen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleSperm blocking is not a male adaptation to sperm competition in a parasitoid waspen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Biological Diversityen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciencesen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arx156
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2018-12-08


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record