Secondary transfer effects of intergroup contact : Alternative accounts and underlying processes
MetadataShow full item record
Altmetrics Handle Statistics
Altmetrics DOI Statistics
Although intergroup contact is one of the most prominent interventions to reduce prejudice, the generalization of contact effects is still a contentious issue. This research further examined the rarely studied secondary transfer effect (STE; Pettigrew, 2009), by which contact with a primary outgroup reduces prejudice toward secondary groups that are not directly involved in the contact. Across 3 cross-sectional studies conducted in Cyprus (N = 1,653), Northern Ireland (N = 1,973), and Texas (N = 275) and 1 longitudinal study conducted in Northern Ireland (N = 411), the present research sought to systematically rule out alternative accounts of the STE and to investigate 2 potential mediating mechanisms (ingroup reappraisal and attitude generalization). Results indicated that, consistent with the STE, contact with a primary outgroup predicts attitudes toward secondary outgroups, over and above contact with the secondary outgroup, socially desirable responding, and prior attitudes. Mediation analyses found strong evidence for attitude generalization but only limited evidence for ingroup reappraisal as an underlying process. Two out of 3 tests of a reverse model, where contact with the secondary outgroup predicts attitudes toward the primary outgroup, provide further evidence for an indirect effect through attitude generalization. Theoretical and practical implications of these results are discussed, and directions for future research are identified.
Tausch , N , Hewstone , M , Kenworthy , J B , Psaltis , C , Schmid , K , Popan , J R , Cairns , E & Hughes , J 2010 , ' Secondary transfer effects of intergroup contact : Alternative accounts and underlying processes ' , Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , vol. 99 , no. 2 , pp. 282-302 . https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018553
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
(c)2010 American Psychological Association. This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.