The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
This item has been viewed 18 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Barnier_et_al_Cognitive_Neuropsychiatry_2008_Author_version.pdf68.07 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Developing hypnotic analogues of clinical delusions : Mirrored-self misidentification
Authors: Barnier, Amanda
Cox, Rochelle
O'Connor, Akira Robert
Coltheart, Max
Langdon, Robyn
Breen, Nora
Turner, Martha
Keywords: Delusion
Cognitive Neuropsychology
Mirrored Self-Identification
Hypnotic Analogues
RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Issue Date: Sep-2008
Citation: Barnier , A , Cox , R , O'Connor , A R , Coltheart , M , Langdon , R , Breen , N & Turner , M 2008 , ' Developing hypnotic analogues of clinical delusions : Mirrored-self misidentification ' Cognitive Neuropsychiatry , vol 13 , no. 5 , pp. 406-430 . , 10.1080/13546800802355666
Abstract: Introduction. Despite current research interest in delusional beliefs, there are no viable models for studying delusions in the laboratory. However, hypnosis offers a technique for creating transient delusions that are resistant to challenge. The aim of this study was to develop an hypnotic analogue of one important delusion, mirrored-self misidentification. Methods. Twelve high hypnotisable participants received an hypnotic suggestion to see either a stranger in the mirror, a mirror as a window, or a mirror as a window with a view to a stranger. Participants' deluded beliefs were challenged, and following hypnosis, Sheehan and McConkey's (1982) Experiential Analysis Technique was used to explore participants' phenomenological experience of the delusion. Results. The majority of participants did not recognise their reflection in the mirror, described the person in the mirror as having different physical characteristics to themselves, and maintained their delusion when challenged. Conclusions. The hypnotic suggestion created a credible, compelling delusion with features strikingly similar to clinical cases of mirrored-self misidentification. Our findings suggest that Factor 2 within Langdon and Coltheart's (2000) two-factor framework may involve a lowering of the criteria used to accept or reject delusional hypotheses.
Version: Postprint
Status: Peer reviewed
ISSN: 1354-6805
Type: Journal article
Rights: This is an electronic version of an article published in Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 13(5), available online at:
Appears in Collections:University of St Andrews Research
Psychology & Neuroscience Research

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)