Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorHarris, Mark
dc.contributor.authorEspelt-Bombin, Silvia
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-07T10:30:25Z
dc.date.available2018-11-07T10:30:25Z
dc.date.issued2018-10-01
dc.identifier.citationHarris , M & Espelt-Bombin , S 2018 , ' Rethinking Amerindian spaces in Brazilian history ' Ethnohistory , vol. 65 , no. 4 , pp. 537-547 . https://doi.org/10.1215/00141801-6991187en
dc.identifier.issn0014-1801
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 256369909
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 1f0da148-d2e7-4d69-a89c-47c4a769ccd8
dc.identifier.otherRIS: urn:B29497780EB5EEC1EFA5EF7F8F7D7284
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85055588327
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-1124-5217/work/50167348
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000447380300001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10023/16408
dc.descriptionWe are grateful to the British Academy and the Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2012-699 and SG132847 2014-2015) for funding.en
dc.description.abstractThis special issue on Amerindian spaces is the result of a workshop held at the University of St. Andrews, UK, in June 2015. We asked participants to examine key concepts related to spatial history, such as borderlands, frontiers, and territories, by looking at them through alliances and rebellions involving Amerindians and the colonial and independent states in Latin America.1 Our aim was to gain a continental understanding of Indian political geography that went beyond European territorial divisions. This purpose continues into the present issue with its focus on the internal and international frontiers of Brazil and how they relate to spaces of indigenous collective action. The articles here reexamine areas that have been considered peripheral in Brazilian historiography, placing the emphasis on indigenous history and society. These spaces proved surprisingly impervious to the imposition of external authority, but each space has its own history that cannot be solely defined by the internal and external frontiers of Brazilian colonial and national expansion. Equally, these indigenous spaces influenced policy and practice, as governments sought to exert control over native labor and advance land settlement for colonists. Our choice for a spatial perspective forces an examination of a regionally connected system of social groups and the environments in which people lived, and which they sought to protect and defend. As a result, we go beyond place, territory, and frontier as concepts and use the term space to invoke a direct and holistic relationship with the larger spheres in which people move and act.
dc.format.extent11
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEthnohistoryen
dc.rightsCopyright © 2018 by American Society for Ethnohistory. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/00141801-6991187en
dc.subjectGN Anthropologyen
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccGNen
dc.titleRethinking Amerindian spaces in Brazilian historyen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.Social Anthropologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews.School of Philosophical, Anthropological and Film Studiesen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1215/00141801-6991187
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record