Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorFazey, Ioan Raymond Albert
dc.contributor.authorSalisbury, J G
dc.contributor.authorLindenmayer, D B
dc.contributor.authorMaindonald, J
dc.contributor.authorDouglas, R
dc.date.accessioned2010-12-06T20:36:02Z
dc.date.available2010-12-06T20:36:02Z
dc.date.issued2004-09
dc.identifier.citationFazey , I R A , Salisbury , J G , Lindenmayer , D B , Maindonald , J & Douglas , R 2004 , ' Can methods applied in medicine be used to summarize and disseminate conservation research? ' , Environmental Conservation , vol. 31 , no. 3 , pp. 190-198 . https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892904001560en
dc.identifier.issn0376-8929
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 4709807
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: e40d6731-cbd4-454b-af60-fcd0af537270
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000226971200004
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 13244282946
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/1630
dc.description.abstractTo ensure that the best scientific evidence is available to guide conservation action, effective mechanisms for communicating the results of research are necessary. In medicine, an evidence-based approach assists doctors in applying scientific evidence when treating patients. The approach has required the development of new methods for systematically reviewing research, and has led to the establishment of independent organizations to disseminate the conclusions of reviews. (1) Such methods could help bridge gaps between researchers and practitioners of environmental conservation. In medicine, systematic reviews place strong emphasis on reviewing experimental clinical trials that meet strict standards. Although experimental studies are much less common in conservation, many of the components of systematic reviews that reduce the biases when identifying, selecting and appraising relevant studies could still be applied effectively. Other methods already applied in medicine for the review of non-experimental studies will therefore be required in conservation. (2) Using systematic reviews and an evidence-based approach will only be one tool of many to reduce uncertainty when making conservation-related decisions. Nevertheless an evidence-based approach does complement other approaches (for example adaptive management), and could facilitate the use of the best available research in environmental management. (3) In medicine, the Cochrane Collaboration was established as an independent organization to guide the production and dissemination of systematic reviews. It has provided many benefits that could apply to conservation, including a forum for producing and disseminating reviews with emphasis on the requirements of practitioners, and a forum for feedback between researchers and practitioners and improved access to the primary research. Without the Cochrane Collaboration, many of the improvements in research communication that have occurred in medicine over the last decade would not have been possible.
dc.format.extent9
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Conservationen
dc.rights(c)2004 Foundation for Environmental Conservationen
dc.subjectConservation researchen
dc.subjectDisseminating researchen
dc.subjectEvidence-based conservationen
dc.subjectImplementing scienceen
dc.subjectScience communicationen
dc.subjectSystematic reviewsen
dc.subjectSustainable useen
dc.subjectManagementen
dc.subjectLandscapeen
dc.subjectWildlifeen
dc.subjectEcologyen
dc.subjectImplementationen
dc.subjectRestorationen
dc.subjectPopulationsen
dc.subjectCausationen
dc.subjectMortalityen
dc.subjectQH Natural historyen
dc.subject.lccQHen
dc.titleCan methods applied in medicine be used to summarize and disseminate conservation research?en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Geography & Sustainable Developmenten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Geography and Geosciencesen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892904001560
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record