Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorYang, Yuan
dc.contributor.authorCameron, Josie
dc.contributor.authorBedi, Carolyn
dc.contributor.authorHumphris, G.
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-22T08:30:06Z
dc.date.available2018-10-22T08:30:06Z
dc.date.issued2018-10-20
dc.identifier.citationYang , Y , Cameron , J , Bedi , C & Humphris , G 2018 , ' Fear of cancer recurrence trajectory during radiation treatment and follow-up into survivorship of patients with breast cancer ' , BMC Cancer , vol. 18 , 1002 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4908-2en
dc.identifier.issn1471-2407
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 256147999
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: e9098ccf-78fc-4932-8f96-8af07d1eb165
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85055076904
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000447737400005
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-4601-8834/work/64033834
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/16292
dc.descriptionFunding: Generous support received from Breast Cancer Now (Grant No. 6873).en
dc.description.abstractBackground:  Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) has been shown to be higher in patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (RT) compared to those untreated. However, little is known about the dynamics of patient’s FCR during and after RT. The aim of this study was to examine FCR levels in a longitudinal panel design with breast cancer patients receiving RT. Methods:  Consecutive newly-diagnosed breast cancer patients (n = 94) attending a single cancer centre were invited to complete a 7-item FCR scale (FCR7) that was collected weekly by paper instrument and at a follow-up phone call 6–8 weeks after completion of RT. Descriptive statistics, and Latent Growth Curve Modelling (LGCM) were utilised to analyse the data. Results:  Women who were younger, single/separated, had chemotherapy, had extra boost radiation treatment, taking Herceptin and treated by 4-field technique reported higher recurrence fear at baseline. There was strong evidence of substantial variation in the trajectory of FCR (z = − 3.54, p < .0001). The average trajectory of FCR over RT was negative (unstandardized estimate = − 0.59) and associated with FCR follow-up level (standardised estimate = 0.36, z = 3.05, p < .002), independent of baseline recurrence fears. Conclusion:  Patients vary in their trajectory of recurrence fears over RT which predicts FCR approximately 2 months following treatment. Review appointments by therapy radiographers presents an opportunity to intervene in FCR trajectories. Trial registration:  ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02599506. Prospectively registered on 11th March 2015
dc.format.extent9
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Canceren
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2018. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en
dc.subjectCommunicationen
dc.subjectFear of recurrenceen
dc.subjectLongitudinalen
dc.subjectRadiation treatmenten
dc.subjectTrajectoryen
dc.subjectRC0254 Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology (including Cancer)en
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingen
dc.subject.lccRC0254en
dc.titleFear of cancer recurrence trajectory during radiation treatment and follow-up into survivorship of patients with breast canceren
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Population and Behavioural Science Divisionen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. WHO Collaborating Centre for International Child & Adolescent Health Policyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Health Psychologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. St Andrews Sustainability Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Medicineen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4908-2
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record