The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
This item has been viewed 47 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Fazey2006EcologySociety11ElicitingImplicitKnowledge.pdf417.87 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Eliciting the implicit knowledge and perceptions of on-ground conservation managers of the Macquarie Marshes
Authors: Fazey, Ioan Raymond Albert
Proust, Katrina
Newell, Barry
Johnson, Bill
Fazey, John A.
Keywords: Conservation management
Water resources
Traditional ecological knowledge
Tacit knowledge
Arid australia
QH Natural history
Issue Date: Jun-2006
Citation: Fazey , I R A , Proust , K , Newell , B , Johnson , B & Fazey , J A 2006 , ' Eliciting the implicit knowledge and perceptions of on-ground conservation managers of the Macquarie Marshes ' Ecology and Society , vol 11 , no. 1 , pp. art25 .
Abstract: Knowledge that has been developed through extensive experience of receiving and responding to ecological feedback is particularly valuable for informing and guiding environmental management. This paper captures the implicit understanding of seven experienced on-ground conservation managers about the conservation issues affecting the Ramsar listed Macquarie Marshes in New South Wales, Australia. Multiple interviews, a workshop, and meetings were used to elicit the manager's knowledge. The managers suggest that the Macquarie Marshes are seriously threatened by a lack of water, and immediate steps need to be taken to achieve more effective water delivery. Their knowledge and perceptions of the wider societal impediments to achieving more effective water delivery have also led the managers to suggest that there may be system feedbacks that are reinforcing the tendency for water agencies to favor the short-term interests of the irrigation industry. Although the managers clearly have certain personal interests that influence their understanding and perceptions, much of their knowledge also appears to have been heavily influenced by their ecological understanding of the wetland's dynamics. This paper highlights that although all stakeholders clearly need to be involved in making decisions about conservation and how resources should be used, such decisions should not be confused with the need for consulting people with the appropriate ecological expertise to help determine the degree to which an ecological system is threatened, the likely ecological causes of the threats, and actions that may be needed to restore and maintain a functional ecosystem.
Version: Publisher PDF
Status: Peer reviewed
ISSN: 1708-3087
Type: Journal article
Rights: (c)2006 the authors. Published by The Resilience Alliance, available at
Appears in Collections:Geography & Sustainable Development Research
University of St Andrews Research
Scottish Oceans Institute Research
Geography & Geosciences Research

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)