Paradoxes of signification
MetadataShow full item record
Ian Rumfitt has recently drawn our attention to a couple of paradoxes of signification, claiming that although Thomas Bradwardine's "multiple-meanings'' account of truth and signification can solve the first of them, it cannot solve the second. Bradwardine's solution appears to turn on a distinction between the principal and the consequential signification of an utterance. The paradoxes of signification were in fact much discussed by Bradwardine's successors in the fourteenth century. It is shown that Bradwardine's account of signification turns not on a distinction between principal and consequential signification, but between partial and total signification, and that accordingly his solution, unlike those of his successors, does not fall prey to Rumfitt's paradoxes.
Read , S 2016 , ' Paradoxes of signification ' , Vivarium , vol. 54 , no. 4 , 4 , pp. 335-355 . https://doi.org/10.1163/15685349-12341325
© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2016. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685349-12341325
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.