The University of St Andrews

Research@StAndrews:FullText >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >
University of St Andrews Research >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
This item has been viewed 265 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Byrne2009-CCBR-ElephantCognition.pdf616.21 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Elephant cognition in primate perspective
Authors: Byrne, Richard William
Bates, Lucy
Moss, C J
Keywords: Loxodonta
Cognitive maps
Social knowledge
Social memory
Classification learning
Quantity discrimination
QL Zoology
Issue Date: 2009
Citation: Byrne , R W , Bates , L & Moss , C J 2009 , ' Elephant cognition in primate perspective ' Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews , vol 4 , pp. 65-79 . , 10.3819/ccbr.2009.40009
Abstract: On many of the staple measures of comparative psychology, elephants show no obvious differences from other mammals, such as primates: discrimination learning, memory, spontaneous tool use, etc. However, a range of more naturalistic measures have recently suggested that elephant cognition may be rather different. Wild elephants sub-categorize humans into groups, independently making this classification on the basis of scent or colour. In number discrimination, elephants show no effects of absolute magnitude or relative size disparity in making number judgements. In the social realm, elephants show empathy into the problems faced by others, and give hints of special abilities in cooperation, vocal imitation and perhaps teaching. Field data suggest that the elephant’s vaunted reputation for memory may have a factual basis, in two ways. Elephants’ ability to remember large-scale space over long periods suggests good cognitive mapping skills. Elephants’ skill in keeping track of the current locations of many family members implies that working memory may be unusually developed, consistent with the laboratory finding that their quantity judgements do not show the usual magnitude effects.
Version: Publisher PDF
Status: Peer reviewed
ISSN: 1911-4745
Type: Journal article
Rights: (c)2009 Richard W. Byrne Copyright in this article is held by the authors
Appears in Collections:University of St Andrews Research
Psychology & Neuroscience Research

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2012  Duraspace - Feedback
For help contact: | Copyright for this page belongs to St Andrews University Library | Terms and Conditions (Cookies)