Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorWebster, Michael Munro
dc.contributor.authorLaland, Kevin Neville
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-10T23:35:39Z
dc.date.available2018-09-10T23:35:39Z
dc.date.issued2017-11-13
dc.identifier251081447
dc.identifier127a198f-65bd-49ae-9aa5-fa5fa554c4ef
dc.identifier85043979860
dc.identifier000415675000018
dc.identifier.citationWebster , M M & Laland , K N 2017 , ' Social information use and social learning in non-grouping fishes ' , Behavioral Ecology , vol. 28 , no. 6 , pp. 1547-1552 . https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arx121en
dc.identifier.issn1045-2249
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-9597-6871/work/60427812
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-2457-0900/work/60630369
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/16001
dc.descriptionFunding: NERC (NE/D010365/1) and European Research Council advanced grants (EVOCULTURE 232823).en
dc.description.abstractAlthough it is natural to expect that group-living animals will utilize social learning, the expectation for non-grouping species is less clear. Only a few studies have explored the relationship between sociality and social learning. Here we presented 4 non-grouping fish species, fifteenspine sticklebacks (Spinachia spinachia), bullhead sculpins (Cottus gobio), stone loach (Barbatula barbatula) and juvenile European flounders (Platichthys flesus) with social information provided by groups of a shoal-forming heterospecific, the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Using a binary choice procedure we allowed individual test subjects to select between simulated prey patches. Although the test subjects could not sample the patches directly they were able to use information generated by the heterospecific demonstrators to select the “richer” of the 2 patches. For comparison we also recorded social information use in 2 shoaling species, threespine, and ninespine sticklebacks (Pungitius pungitius). We saw evidence of social information use and social learning in all 6 species, with no differences seen between social and non-grouping species. We argue that social learning is not likely to be restricted to group-living species, since many solitary species too are regularly exposed to social stimuli from both conspecifics and heterospecifics, and can benefit from using social information. We suggest that researchers have much to learn about the sensory, perceptive, and cognitive mechanisms underlying social learning, and the extent to which these vary (if at all) between grouping and non-grouping species.
dc.format.extent6
dc.format.extent587008
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBehavioral Ecologyen
dc.subjectCopyingen
dc.subjectLearningen
dc.subjectProducer-scroungeren
dc.subjectSocial informationen
dc.subjectSocial learningen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectDASen
dc.subjectBDCen
dc.subjectR2Cen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleSocial information use and social learning in non-grouping fishesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.sponsorNERCen
dc.contributor.sponsorEuropean Research Councilen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Social Learning & Cognitive Evolutionen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciencesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Biological Diversityen
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/beheco/arx121
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2018-09-11
dc.identifier.grantnumberNE/D010365/1en
dc.identifier.grantnumberen


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record