Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorJackson, P.
dc.contributor.authorCresswell, Will
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-07T23:35:34Z
dc.date.available2018-09-07T23:35:34Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationJackson , P & Cresswell , W 2017 , ' Factors determining the frequency and productivity of double brooding of Barn Owls Tyto alba ' , Bird Study , vol. 64 , no. 3 , pp. 353-361 . https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2017.1363716en
dc.identifier.issn0006-3657
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 250608896
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: e53e1627-251d-4dea-b20a-6aa1b7828bd9
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85029500778
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-4684-7624/work/60426946
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000410818700008
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/15991
dc.descriptionThis work received financial support towards the many nest monitoring visits from Peterborough City Council, Milton Keynes Borough Council and the Environment Agency.en
dc.description.abstractCapsule :  Early nesting Barn Owls Tyto alba and those that switched nest sites fledged most chicks overall because they could fit two, more productive, nesting attempts into a breeding season. Aims:   To determine the frequency and productivity of double broods in Barn Owls, and for double brooders, to determine what affects the probability of nest switching and how that affects productivity. Methods:   We monitored the first egg date of each nesting attempt, whether it was in a ‘vole year’, whether a breeding attempt was first or a second annual attempt, the number of chicks fledged from each attempt, and whether a pair switched nest sites, if breeding twice, from 602 Barn Owl breeding attempts in an area of lowland England from 1996 to 2007. General linear models were used to determine predictors of the probability that a pair had a second brood and the number of chicks fledged in each nesting attempt, and then for those owls that double brooded, which variables best predicted the probability of switching, and the number of chicks fledged from the second nest. Finally, we tested whether switching resulted in a shorter laying interval and higher annual productivity. Results:   Early nesting birds were more likely to double brood, although this was relaxed in vole years when later nesting birds also double brooded. Productivity (through increased numbers of chicks fledged or reduced chick loss) was higher the earlier a nest occurred, and there were more chicks fledged in good vole years and in second nesting attempts. Productivity, brood depletion, first clutch date and vole years did not determine whether a double brooding pair switched nesting sites. Productivity in the second nest did not change with a switch but productivity increased for early first nests and second nests with a shorter interval between the first and second nest. Switching however decreased nesting interval and nesting interval was also shorter if there were fewer fledglings from the first nest. Overall productivity was higher for pairs that switched. Conclusions:   Double brooding in Barn Owls increased seasonal productivity substantially and its occurrence depended on vole abundance or early nesting. Nest switching between broods may be a strategy for earlier laying of the second brood. Provision of alternative nest sites, close together in a Barn Owl’s home range, may allow earlier re-nesting and so increase productivity.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBird Studyen
dc.rights© 2017 British Trust for Ornithology. This work has been made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. The final published version of this work is available at https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2017.1363716en
dc.subjectGE Environmental Sciencesen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subject.lccGEen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleFactors determining the frequency and productivity of double brooding of Barn Owls Tyto albaen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciencesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. St Andrews Sustainability Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Biological Diversityen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2017.1363716
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2018-09-08


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record