Files in this item
Impossible worlds and the logic of imagination
Item metadata
dc.contributor.author | Berto, Francesco | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-09-04T11:30:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-09-04T11:30:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Berto , F 2017 , ' Impossible worlds and the logic of imagination ' , Erkenntnis , vol. 82 , no. 6 , pp. 1277-1297 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-017-9875-5 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0165-0106 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE: 255688937 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE UUID: 9a0fc2d8-e315-46bc-8710-0e21f05d9d53 | |
dc.identifier.other | Scopus: 85011290473 | |
dc.identifier.other | ORCID: /0000-0003-3246-657X/work/48132002 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10023/15959 | |
dc.description | This paper is published within the project “The Logic of Conceivability”, funded by the European Research Council (ERC CoG), grant number 681404. | en |
dc.description.abstract | I want to model a finite, fallible cognitive agent who imagines that p in the sense of mentally representing a scenario—a configuration of objects and properties—correctly described by p. I propose to capture imagination, so understood, via variably strict world quantifiers, in a modal framework including both possible and so-called impossible worlds. The latter secure lack of classical logical closure for the relevant mental states, while the variability of strictness captures how the agent imports information from actuality in the imagined non-actual scenarios. Imagination turns out to be highly hyperintensional, but not logically anarchic. Section 1 sets the stage and impossible worlds are quickly introduced in Sect. 2. Section 3 proposes to model imagination via variably strict world quantifiers. Section 4 introduces the formal semantics. Section 5 argues that imagination has a minimal mereological structure validating some logical inferences. Section 6 deals with how imagination under-determines the represented contents. Section 7 proposes additional constraints on the semantics, validating further inferences. Section 8 describes some welcome invalidities. Section 9 examines the effects of importing false beliefs into the imagined scenarios. Finally, Sect. 10 hints at possible developments of the theory in the direction of two-dimensional semantics. | |
dc.format.extent | 21 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Erkenntnis | en |
dc.rights | © The Author(s) 2017. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. | en |
dc.subject | B Philosophy (General) | en |
dc.subject | BC Logic | en |
dc.subject | Philosophy | en |
dc.subject | Logic | en |
dc.subject | T-NDAS | en |
dc.subject.lcc | B1 | en |
dc.subject.lcc | BC | en |
dc.title | Impossible worlds and the logic of imagination | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.description.version | Publisher PDF | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of St Andrews. Philosophy | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-017-9875-5 | |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.