Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorWeatherson, Brian James
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-27T23:34:13Z
dc.date.available2018-07-27T23:34:13Z
dc.date.issued2017-04-01
dc.identifier244241564
dc.identifierc9e72c95-1bb3-40ce-9f47-4198062e3b2c
dc.identifier85047346742
dc.identifier.citationWeatherson , B J 2017 , ' Intellectual skill and the Rylean regress ' , The Philosophical Quarterly , vol. 67 , no. 267 , pp. 370-386 . https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqw051en
dc.identifier.issn0031-8094
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/15726
dc.description.abstractIntelligent activity requires the use of various intellectual skills. While these skills are connected to knowledge, they should not be identified with knowledge. There are realistic examples where the skills in question come apart from knowledge. That is, there are realistic cases of knowledge without skill, and of skill without knowledge. Whether a person is intelligent depends, in part, on whether they have these skills. Whether a particular action is intelligent depends, in part, on whether it was produced by an exercise of skill. These claims promote a picture of intelligence that is in tension with a strongly intellectualist picture, though they are not in tension with a number of prominent claims recently made by intellectualists.
dc.format.extent91159
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofThe Philosophical Quarterlyen
dc.subjectB Philosophy (General)en
dc.subjectT-NDASen
dc.subject.lccB1en
dc.titleIntellectual skill and the Rylean regressen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Philosophical, Anthropological and Film Studiesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Philosophyen
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/pq/pqw051
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.date.embargoedUntil2018-07-27


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record