Show simple item record

Files in this item

Thumbnail

Item metadata

dc.contributor.authorNwaogu, Chima Josiah
dc.contributor.authorTieleman, B. Irene
dc.contributor.authorBitrus, Kwanye
dc.contributor.authorCresswell, William Richard Lawrence
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-05T14:30:05Z
dc.date.available2018-07-05T14:30:05Z
dc.date.issued2018-10
dc.identifier253199123
dc.identifier3fbbf4b6-673a-4326-b372-8b75189c5ab3
dc.identifier85059266443
dc.identifier000441943700018
dc.identifier.citationNwaogu , C J , Tieleman , B I , Bitrus , K & Cresswell , W R L 2018 , ' Temperature and aridity determine body size conformity to Bergmann’s rule independent of latitudinal differences in a tropical environment ' , Journal of Ornithology , vol. 159 , no. 4 , pp. 1053–1062 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-018-1574-8en
dc.identifier.issn2193-7192
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-4684-7624/work/60426932
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10023/15004
dc.descriptionC.J.N. was supported by a studentship funded by the Leventis Conservation Foundation through the University of St. Andrews, UK.en
dc.description.abstractBergmann’s rule, defined as the tendency for endotherms to be larger in colder environments, is a biophysical generalization of body size variation that is frequently tested along latitudinal gradients, even though latitude is only a proxy for temperature variation. We test whether variation in temperature and aridity determine avian body size conformity to Bergmann’s rule independent of latitude differences, using the ubiquitous Common Bulbul Pycnonotus barbatus, along a West African environmental gradient. We trapped 538 birds in 22 locations between latitudes 6 and 13°N in Nigeria, and estimated average body surface area to mass ratio per location. We then modelled body surface to mass ratio using general linear models, with latitude, altitude and one of 19 bioclimatic variables extracted from http://www.worldclim.org/bioclim as predictors. We sequentially dropped latitude and altitude from each model to obtain the R2 of the resultant models. Finally, we compared the R2 of univariate models, where bioclimatic variables predicted body surface area to mass ratio significantly (14 out of 19), to multivariate models including latitude, altitude and a bioclimatic variable, using the Wilcoxon matched pairs test. We found that multivariate models did not perform better than univariate models with only bioclimatic variables. Six temperature and eight precipitation variables significantly predicted variation in body surface area to mass ratio between locations; in fact, 50% (seven out of 14) of these better explained variation in body surface area to mass ratio than the multivariate models. Birds showed a larger body surface area relative to body mass ratio in hotter environments independent of latitude or altitude, which conforms to Bergmann’s rule. Yet, a combination of morphometric analyses and controlled temperature-exposure experiments is required to prove the proposed relationship between relative body surface area and thermoregulation in endotherms.
dc.format.extent10
dc.format.extent1171909
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Ornithologyen
dc.subjectLatitudeen
dc.subjectThermoregulationen
dc.subjectGlobal warmingen
dc.subjectBirdsen
dc.subjectTemperature variationen
dc.subjectBioclimatic variableen
dc.subjectGE Environmental Sciencesen
dc.subjectQH301 Biologyen
dc.subjectNDASen
dc.subject.lccGEen
dc.subject.lccQH301en
dc.titleTemperature and aridity determine body size conformity to Bergmann’s rule independent of latitudinal differences in a tropical environmenten
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. School of Biologyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Scottish Oceans Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Institute of Behavioural and Neural Sciencesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. St Andrews Sustainability Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of St Andrews. Centre for Biological Diversityen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10336-018-1574-8
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record